New Tactics Dialogue Header

Using Theatre for Human Rights Education and Action
Syndicate content
New Tactics's picture



shirinThis month's online dialogue will feature how theater is being used to promote, educate, motivate and move people to action regarding human rights, development and issues "screaming for" change.

This dialogue is an opportunity for you to ask questions, share experiences, and build connections with practitioners using theatre.  We will be sharing stories of how theatre is used as a powerful tool in human rights work.  We will also share theatre exercises and tools that have been useful for groups and communities looking to solve their problems. Please share your own stories and tools!

Our featured resource practitioners come from human rights organizations and theatre groups around the world.  Click here for biographical information on these practitioners.

What is the GOAL of this dialogue? 

The goal of this 7-day conversation among practitioners (with or without experience using theatre) is to encourage participants to reflect on their work and share their experiences, stories, challenges, etc with one another, in order to strengthen the use of theatre for human rights work. By sharing these experiences, conversations may emerge around a challenge shared by several practitioners, or around feedback on a particular resource or tool, or a number of other topics! These conversations will be captured in this dialogue space that you and others can access again in the future.

Specifically, please address these two main themes during this dialogue:

  • Share stories of how theatre is used as a powerful tool in human rights work. 
Why should practitioners consider implementing this tactic in their work? What are the strengths? What are the weaknesses? Why theatre?
  • Share theatre exercises and tools that have been useful for groups and communities looking to solve their problems.
Share practical information on how you implemented your theatre activity. Explain the steps you took to those of us that have never used this tactic. Share resources and tools that others can access to help them to use theatre in their work.

 


Summary of this dialogue:

 

WHY THEATRE

The answers to: “Why Theatre” were many, here are some of the insights shared in the dialogue: The power of theater as a way for people and communities to share their experiences, generate conversation, and enable new insights to emerge. The power of theatre to break down isolation and building hope. By working through theatre, both performers and spectators can engage difficult questions in a safe space. Theatre is also an ideal instrument to give witness to human rights violations. It is also an excellent tool for education and awareness raising. Lastly, these insights can be used to advocate for policy and legislative changes.

As a challenge to the use of theatre, many participants mentioned the need to be aware of its limitations as well:

The discussion also touched upon the question of how/when/if to measure impact.

One participant expressed that assessing the impact through longer time is a way to give testimony for the power of theatre to have a real and lasting impact. Participants also shared the ways in which they gathered information to measure impact, both through a database and through consistently keeping in touch with past participants. Another important issue that was discussed by the participants was the role of the facilitator in creating the theatre project.

One participant pointed out that the most important role of the facilitator was to let the participants tell their own story. Another participant highlighted the need for the facilitator to not take too much control or try to dictate the process, but rather facilitate it. Yet another participant reemphasized that the role of the facilitator is to listen, to support the community they work in and to help them find a way to express that feels important to them.

Another issue highlighted in the role of the facilitator was to be aware of being culturally appropriate, and that the facilitator, especially if working in foreign context, be aware of their own baggage, privilege and expectation. This discussion led to one about the relative importance of process versus outcome, and the different approaches that favors one or the other. The importance of self care was also addressed and answered.

The discussion then turned to more practical matters such as discussing different mediums that could be useful.

Another thread that was brought up was the use of theatre for social change with activists. An idea echoed and suggested as a means to work with activists. Though theatre was expressed as an ideal way in assisting activists in exploring, debriefing, sharing, celebrating, and generally processing "the work", one participant expressed the difficulty in getting activists involved due to lack of time and resources.

SHARE THEATRE EXERCISES AND TOOLS THAT HAVE BEEN USEFUL

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
New Tactics's picture

---SHARE STORIES OF HOW THEATRE IS USED AS A POWERFUL TOOL

Main Theme 1:

  • Share stories of how theatre is used as a powerful tool in human rights work. 

Why should practitioners consider implementing this tactic in their work? What are the strengths? What are the weaknesses? Why theatre?

To add a new story, please 'reply' to this comment.

Xris Reardon's picture

Why Theatre

I work as a Forum theatre practitioner, and TO/TFL training provider in Melbourne, Australia. Currently, I am working on several different projects which include a focus on: environmental  justice, mental health, and substance abuse, amongst  youth at risk. In my work, which I will speak about, theatre has given rise to the individuals to share their experiences, stories around human rights abuses in safe and creative ways. Stories that are then shared with the larger community, the audience, as a means to generate conversation, enable new insights to emerge. These insights can be used to advocate for  policy, legislative changes.  During the workshop process members of the community will come together use theatrical tools, and  techniques to investigate their concerns. Participants research their struggles, obstacles and barriers to participation, access to rights through theatre methods. The collective research enables the breakdown of a sense of alienation, builds group bonds, trust, communion.. eventually enabling the translation, the depiction of personal experiences of oppression, as located within a governing systemic reality. This collective shared wisdom, once accessed, is channeled  to create plays. For instance, in a project on women and economic security, where we had 22 women from diverse ages, abilities, and culture background, who shared the experience of living life on a low income, caring for others, we used theatre to address women's struggle with the money system. Plays were created to depict how poverty impacts, albeit  differently, on their lives.

Through their investigation they generated understandings that became the bases for the plays they offered to audiences. Three plays, one about housing security, domestic violence (economic dependency) and health and employment. All the stories (plays) involved women parenting children. They ended in a moment of crises. At that point audiences were asked to intervene, to name what they saw were the critical struggles, and to identify what strategies they might implement if in the same situation. They did this, through coming up and replacing characters whose struggles they understood to try and create dignity, security.

The outcomes of the conversations and 'dramatic' interventions were written up in a report and tabled as social policy initiatives. They are to be presented to the Office of the Status of Women, amongst one of the governmental bodies the work was targeted at. The women involved in the project will be presenting the outcomes of the report.

I hope to write more, about other projects but this is a start as I am flying out the door. Thanks NEW TACTICS for this inspiring space, opportunity. 

 

kantin's picture

Building a collective shared wisdom

Hi Xris, thanks for sharing this story about the power of theatre. I like the idea of a 'workshop process' being used to investigate their concerns, and thru this collective research they are able to breakdown the sense of alienation and build trust. Building this 'collective shared wisdom' is a crucial step of using theatre and you have articulated it so well. Thanks!

Kristin Antin, New Tactics Online Community Builder

Anna Weekes's picture

Theatre and games giving victims a voice

Leading on from what Xris is saying about using theatre as tool to create policy.

I am involved in a project in Cambodia which is fighting to find some protection for victims of human trafficking once they have are repatriated into the country. This project was multifaceted  as you can imagine and had many different skilled people working on it from prosecution to prevention of human trafficking. 

I work with a group of Khmer theatre makers of mixed background and abilities, who travel the country using theatre and games as a tool for education and awareness rising. In the last year we have been moving more into using participatory theatre to involve the audience, and empower them to make the change that is being promoted.

We were called upon to create a series of short plays based on case studies of victims of trafficking, these plays were to be used to garner information from service providers, including, social workers, police, village chiefs, border officials and doctors, to create a government Praka of victims rights and a set of national minimum standards as a guideline for service providers and carers of survivors. The plays were used in consultation across the whole of Cambodia, the stories were analyzed and recommendations were offered for improvement of the care of survivors of trafficking, according to individual's experiences.

This work sparked something in the theatre troupe, as many of them were survivors of some form of exploitation. They begin to understand what had happened to them, they became aware of how it made them feel and most importantly the empowerment that came from them sharing their stories. they felt relieved that they could do something that would ensure that others received the care that they required, and this acted as a healing mechanism for them.

 

Therefore they wanted to take it to the shelters, to the people who will be receiving the care, the people who had suffered the exploitation. We began to run workshops in shelters for survivors, using participatory theatre and drama activities for those in shelters to express their needs and their expectations of care in shelters, whilst educating them on their basic rights as a survivor. The participants were encouraged to jump in during the case studies and play a part, they could become the police officer or the social worker or the character who had been trafficked. Through this practice ideas on what survivors wanted and needed from their service providers became apparent. While they took control of the situation, they could recreate a story so that a victim fully recovered, that was incredibly empowering for them.

All of the feed back was gathered and is currently being written into a set of standards for service providers, while the games and activities from the initial workshops with service providers have been developed into a training manual for service providers, and the participatory theatre and games that were run in the shelters is being produced as a tool for service providers to involve and empower victims in their own recovery.  

wow.. its good to stop and try to reflect with violence of articulation, not my strong point.. look forward to the next few days.

 

npearson's picture

Resources that emerged from Cambodia experience

Anna,

Thank you for sharing this example that has resulted in some exciting resources. Is it possible to share how people can get these resources? 

You mentioned two different resources:

1) A training manual for service providers

2) Tools resource of participatory theatre and games that were run in the shelters

Please let us know how we can follow up on these resources to share more widely.

Nancy Pearson, New Tactics in Human Rights Program Manager

Xris Reardon's picture

Dealing with stigma..through the arts. Participants' perspective

Hi - I just wanted to contribute the perspective of a participant who is engaged in a process I am facilitating, which involves the use of theatre to investigate, address, and promote the rights of people living with, and caring for someone with a mental health illness. We got to talking about the use of theatre, perspectives, and they wanted to contribute their voice. Many of the participants in the project have been in psych institutions, have dealt with being: misunderstood, excluded, violated, victimized, assault, medicated, put under surveillance, locked up, policed - and you get the rest..

The individual whose words are typed below gave their full consent to being published on this site, for the purposes of being involved in the dialogue.  This is their statement:  "The arts reaches people on a level that trying to convince them intellectually does not because drawing or painting, or music or poetry or acting come from deep inside  - they touch people on a deep level, which is where the stigma and 'stuff' lives because it's not logical. It is a totally illogical, irrational thing. So appealing - if you appeal. I mean I know people have huge prejudices and yeah prejudices against people with mental health issues and have fear of it, but if you talk to them they sound like they don't.  They can talk about it very rationally but when they are confronted with someone who is suicidal or freaking out, their terrified  I think the arts reach people on the sort of level where that irrational fear and stuff live.."

npearson's picture

Participant perspective

Xris,

What a powerful sharing you offered from the participant in your theater process. It's really exciting to hear that she wanted to share this important perspective in the on-line dialogue. Please offer our thanks!

I fully agree that the aspect of the arts -  "drawing or painting, or music or poetry or acting come from deep inside"  - and provide both an individual as well as collective opportunity for response. On an individual level, it connects with my own unique history, personality, life-experiences that highlight my fears, demons, hopes, desires, etc.

But theater also connects on the collective level because it takes place in a group (small to large) and the energy generated in that collective space is also powerful.

As stated by your participant stated, "I think the arts reach people on the sort of level where that irrational fear and stuff live." This frees information and emotion to be shared in completely different ways from other formats. One excellent example of this on the New Tactics website comes from the tactical notebook written by Oulimata Gaye from RADI in Senegal, "Using Popular Theatre to Break the Silence Around Violence Against Women".

Nancy Pearson, New Tactics in Human Rights Program Manager

max.vond's picture

Witnessing and addressing, making the space safe

Hello everybody,

So great to see these thoughts brewing away!  Thank you all for your contributions so far.

I want to talk about witnessing, in the sense of viewing things as they are, and addressing, in the sense of doing something about a situation.

I think it is really important to remember that the first step in a process of making drama about a human rights issue is to understand that issue well.  This takes time and patience. It is tempting to rush ahead and try to make change happen, but I think this should be resisted in  favor of really getting to the  story first.

Here is an anecdote to illustrate what I mean:

Last night I saw a performance of a Forum Theatre play in London that was made to engage with homeless people. It was performed in a day centre near Kings Cross station.  After the performance, the Joker (that's the  person moderating the performance) had a terribly difficult time getting the audience at the centre to engage in a fruitful discussion about the play (though, she did it in the end, the hero).  The play wasn't relevant enough.  It was well-written, but didn't get to the personal stories and  lives of those who were watching.  So... they didn't engage very much, and the goal of 'addressing the issue' wasn't reached.  The mistake, as I see it, was that they didn't honor and respect the issues they were dealing with enough to really find the story they needed to tell.

I made this mistake before when I was working in Sudan in a theatre project aimed at building peace. I did not spend time listening to my participants, but rather, preached peace and reconciliation and plunged headlong into an adapted version of Romeo and Juliet (so ambitious!).  At a certain point, my actors mutinied.  We were rehearsing a scene of the play that involved a public conflict between two groups, and they stopped and told me they could not go on.  It was too real.  It was rubbing the real conflict in their face, in a dictatorial manner, before giving them a chance to tell their story.  I had to scrap that play, in the end, and we went for something much softer, a comedy sketch show.  It was a far cry from directly confronting the conflict,  but it was a good reflection of what the society was ready for at that point  in time.

What I'm  trying to say is, make space and time for people to tell their stories, and the action will emerge.  Witness the issue before trying to address it.  Sometimes just hearing a story told is enough to take care of what needs taking care of... 

This view favors longer workshop periods, attentiveness to the experiences that people  are going through in the process of making a play, and a priority given  to  process over product. 

The word transformation is used a lot in  these dialogues.  Its a good word, because its a bit vague and can mean a lot of things.   It is an intangible, and that's a good thing.  There's lots to say about  it, but one thing is, you can't force  it.  Just watch the story emerge.

okay, that's it for me now!  more later!

aabusrour's picture

Max point on Witnessing and addressing and making space safe

I guess you are touching an important point her, dear Max

The possibility for telling the personal story is very important, however it might be hard for people to tell in the beginning. I guess the example you give in Sudan have been many times repeated in Palestine, with this philosophy love each other as if nothing happened. In the same time, Romeo and Juliet was the first play people speak about to reunite people.

We have been a lot requested to make common shows with Israelis, and we didn't accept. Our refusal didn't come from hatred or carelessness, but because of the fact that theatre should be a place where people feel safe to tell their stories as they want to tell them, however extreme they might be, which would help them fin the peace within them before talking about the peace with the other. This is one of the great things about theatre.

 

AbdelFattah Abusrour, PhD Ashoka Fellow Director of Al-Rowwad Cultural and Theatre Training Center ____________________________________________ Alrowwad is an Independent Center for artistic, cultural, and theatre training for

missmagan's picture

Theatre as reconciliation in Palestine

I travelled to the West Bank in the summer of 2006, and spent the night in Bethlehem with Abed and his beautiful family, and got a chance to get to know the Al-Rowwad programs a bit.  I remember asking Abed if they ever did joint projects with Israeli kids, and was shocked when he said no.  I guess in my American brain, the idea of Palestinian kids and Israeli kids coming together to do a play seems nice and hopeful - the kids would make friends and when they grew up, might have more compassion for the other side.  Abed talked to me about "normalization", something I had never heard of or thought of before, and it blew my mind.  What he said was that to do a joint theatre project would "normalize" the occupation for people - make it seem like things were ok, that relations were ok between Israelis and Palestinians.  That to have Israeli and Palestinian kids doing any sort of reconciliatory-based theatre wouldn't be truthful, because it would have to ignore the gross injustices of occupation.  I'm wondering what thoughts you all have on this.  A lot of people will come to me, very excited about some project - Palestinian and Israeli girls sent to live together in American or Britain for 3 months, to learn to get along and to talk about their differences - and are disappointed, confused, and offended when I say that I don't think this is the appropriate time for such projects...that it would be a great project to do when the occupation has ended, but not before.  I hope I quoted you accurately Abed, please correct me if I did not. I'm going to try and start a new thread about culturally  appropriate theatre - what it is and isn't.  I'd love to hear what other folks have to say.

Xris Reardon's picture

Inter cultural dialogue through theatre - perspective

I wanted to just offer a experience / perspective on the use of theatre as a space for inter-cultural dialogue/exchange. My particularly experiences arises out of a project on  young peoples struggle with drugs and alcohol and in the context of differing class based perspectives. The project brought youth together from two very different socio-economic backgrounds to address the above topic (struggle with drugs and alcohol).

Everyone in the room came VOLUNTARILY. They also came in knowing the issues we are there to investigate (this issues is always overt in the recruitment process). Some of the youth in the room have issues with drugs and alcohol consumption, taking safe risks. Others were more concerned with questions of peer pressure, what do to about friends who are, or do use. Again the investigation around participants concerns was undertaking through games, exercises, IMAGE making techniques. 

This project was not necessarily envisioned as a forum for "inter cultural exchange" but through an embodied process, what initially dominated the space, was that participants from 'more middle class backgrounds' approach to the issues, their overall relationship, (I am speaking in the dangerous territory of generalizations here) was to reflect how COOL it is to 'use'. There were a myriad of reasons WHY this attitude of "coolness" was in the room. This was to come out latter and had a lot to do with fear, and the difflculty of taking themselves seriously.

What I want to focus on here, is not so much the above, but how on the other hand students from lower socio economic backgrounds, talking through the body, about their struggle, created such different images. Youth from low socio economic backgrounds, which often (as is the case) includes youth from more diverse ethnic backgrounds, made images  that spoke to a very different relationship to the issues. They spoke to their struggle as mediated by poverty (relative to the Australian context). They talked about how drugs, dealing in particular was for many, a way out of poverty: being a dealer, for some, was an aspiration  where the money, the status, POWER lies. AS in another project looking at similar issues amongst kids from low income families, or families on welfare, being a dealer meant: "I can buy a gold Mercedes.." This is where the thinking went initially. 

In yet another case, on homelessness, a group university educate students and homeless people came together and made images of  what homelessness meant. The University graduates made "charitable, well intentioned gestures", whilst the 'homeless' made images that were "anti establishment in nature" Images were made not  in response to each other but simultaneously.  In  both projects the inter-cultural dialogue between the two groups was both profoundly rich and incredibly sobering. Consistently, both groups of students made mention of how important it was to have "the other" in the room.

However, I still have a lot of questions: of course both groups benefitted: there was a impact made by the witnessing, learning, which so obviously mattered. However, from a macro point of view, in the long term, the kids who are from low-socio economic backgrounds go home, go to job agency where computers don't work, where even the artificial plants are dying - (unlike the agencies on the other side of town). They go back to 'situated' despair. By the way, I am not wanting to say that middle class youth don't deal with despair, they do/did, deal with violence, disenfranchisement, what I am trying to grapple with, allude to is the situated difference. How we deal with the systemic reality in the use of theatre for human rights, not education so much, but CHANGE. Change, especially in light of the economic, political, religious spheres of governing reality.

So whilst I think there is real value in focusing on inter cultural dialogue, moving towards seeing ourselves as part of an interdependent system - which is not about developing compassion -  but fostering a real sense that the path towards out liberation is intertwined, I also feel there is something else. As in some contexts this can seem like a fluffy discourse, when learning, assumed privileges are entrenched and systemically (violently) supported. 

For me, the legislative change component of the work; remains vital for this work to carry on beyond the moment, beyond the individuals, the immediate community. Links are what need to be teased out,  the despair, the violence, the deadening of potentiality, that impacts on all of us differently, and methods and means for addressing this.  A range of envisioning techniques might be helpful in developing mechanism for active civic leadership to dream these ideals and action them. I know Augusto Boal has developed a tool called the FUTURE WE ARE AFRAID OF. It still in trial but I believe an important tool (whilst no one tool is perfect). I will try and write down what I remember of it in the next few days.

Anyway thank you, the timely reflection around normalizing, is so important to wrestle with in the work. A feel good experience, that does not attempt to address how we might dismantle binaries, privilege (again if that is where the group wants to go) helps educate people about human rights abuses, but what tools does it advance / provide, leave the community with for initiating bigger picture change.

Finally,  let me say that this post in no way passes comment on the relevancy of using TO in occupied territories at all. That is a situation and context I cant speak too. And I am already sure their is a wealth of perspectives, opinions. I do know there is a TO group working with both Palestinian and Israeli youth. I have no idea how they would see their work.  I can't remember their name, but if someone is interested I can look it up..

 

 

 

kayhanirani's picture

Measuring Theater

Thanks for the thoughtful thread that is developing here. It is great to really get to talk about how to realistically look at the potentials and limits of theater in fighting oppression. It is always difficult to bring groups of different, sometimes opposed, classes/statuses into a workshop together. Again, sometimes it is the unreasonable expectations of the facilitator that can stymie an process before it begins. (see my note on Telling your own story). Do workshops between "opposed" groups always have to focus on the source of that opposition and try to solve that opposition? Here, the process is already being limited. We have already proposed an answer for the workshop - to end homelessness ... to reconcile settler and indigenous ... etc. Why set limits? Our identities are wider than that. Why go for the most extreme groups rather than those that are different but also might have some common thread - like living in the same neighborhood, going to the same school, working in the same location, etc. Let's not always set out to do the extreme.

Also, the effects of this type of work is tremendously hard to measure and quantify, because often the experience of a workshop will stay with a person for a long time, and it is only when that person gathers more life experience can they see and relate to what they learned in the workshop. We as practitioners  living and working in a measurements based world will always rub up against people who want to measure our results. These expectations also limit us and our work. Creating critical thinkers, actors in the world is not a one workshop deal. It takes months and years to cultivate, the theater work is like a little seed that slowly opens and grows into a plant (hopefully) throughout the course of a person's life.

Augusto Boal created Legislative Theater which is a great "product-focused" process. When he was a city councilman in Rio, he set up TO community groups to create skits about the problems in their neighborhoods. Once these skits were created, they were performed in a festival where all the other neighborhoods would take place in helping find solutions - through theater - to the problem. Legal experts were in the process and they extracted resolutions and laws based on what the communities thought were appropriate solutions. He passed quite a large number of laws using this process. It is very interesting.

Xris Reardon's picture

good to hear your thoughts..

Hi - was good to hear your comments. Yes, coming into a room with the desire to solve oppositions is arrogant.  I think the question of the role of the facilitator, what they think they are doing in the room, the ethics of projects,  who sets up the project, what do they expect, etc;  are really critical. 

As a facilitator, I think, it is essential not to ask people to go where I believe the 'roots lie'.. or into an exploration that I am interested in - somewhere not necessarily  identified by the group. I have been in process like that, and for the sake of the process or group stayed though it was very unhealthy.

In my work it is always the community that decide on what it wants  to shed light on, give voice too. I will only work  by invitation. This means I will only  work on whatever the community deems it's needs are: to address a problem /and issue / or even a dream they are working towards. Once, the community of stake holders, has defined the investigation, decided to apply the methods, I am called in and will point out, various different ethics, including: that sometimes the process is the outcome.. because  the community in the room is making the call - how far they want to go (no one is forced into doing something to serve someone else goal). 

The community of stake holders will advertise a workshop long before "the workshop" takes place. People coming into the work have most often attend info sessions, receive a phone call (where relevant) about the work - so they can really decide if they are wanting to investigate the theme, I will talk about the process etc; Putting the word out, recruiting people takes an incredible amount of energy and time but is invaluable. So that when people come into the room they come because they want to be there, want to investigate the theme, apply their expertise's.

In the work, the participants are the experts. I will not censor the outcomes of the work, or shape it to suit an agenda (this is also stated to the community of stake holders). If the groups wants to turn and unexpected corner in the work, thats where we go. The unknown potential of the community is our strength collectively, and in the work. In many respects it is what I am most interested in..(on a personal level what brought me to the work) We may start with a lens but who knows where the room will go.  If the room turns an unexpected corner and discovers another concern underlies the fronting issues, the room decides to go there or not.

As a facilitator, and I dont know how others see it but I am there to assist the groups process, their named investigation, struggle, dreaming. I need to know my  tools, how an when to apply them BUT mostly to be able to listen.  To value and honor  the lived experience of participants - that it is their work, is what it's about..

AS far as my experience of measuring outcomes - people talk about coming home to themselves: "I was a wife,  mother, grandmother now I am no longer invisible to myself". I hear participants say:  "I never knew how I was being discriminated against silenced till I talked with others, now I don't just take stuff in ingest it, like it's my fault I deserve it".  Others: "I feel we are closer to naming some of the steps to work towards our dreams".  

These are some of the individual benefits in the process of sharing stories around a common theme. The learnings are powerful - communion breaks down isolation - communion is something most participants have named as a powerful tool for building hope.

The 'long' after workshop experiences of participants is a question I am interested in. What happens when there is no longer this shared space to unpack their concerns...etc? I know working with community stake holders, there is a request, that the work, participants be held after it's finished but yes, evaluating the long term sustained personal benefits is hard to measure. 

Hmm, yes - thanks for your thoughts to bounce off. 

kantin's picture

Measuring your impact

Hi Kayhan and other practitioners,

I can understand the dilemma of trying to measure your impact, when it takes time for your audience to relate to and apply what they have learned. It is frustrating to try to quantify this kind of impact. 

At New Tactics, we also see our work as 'planting seeds' that may take a long time to bear fruit.  We work to help practitioners innovate and adapt tactics to their organization's strategy.  It is clear to us and our audience that the resources are interesting and useful...but it is difficult to articulate this others outside of the process. Like you - trying to measure your audience's increase in ability to think critically about their situation - we have a difficult time quantifying our impact. Additionally, I think you make a great point, when you say that this pressure to quantify impact can limit your work.

What we have tried to do at New Tactics is gather as many qualitative anecdotes as possible (similar to the ones Xris mentions in her comment on measuring impact) and quantify them by using a matrix that we developed. The matrix is two-fold, we measure the level of impact as well as the type of impact. We hope that by coding these qualitative anecdotes, we will be able to put numbers behind what we are telling our audience, partners and donors. It is not perfect, but it has worked for us.

So I am curious if others could share how they measure their impact. Do you  request feedback from the people and communities that you work with? Do you follow up with them after one year, then after several years? Have you developed anykind of matrix to quantify the results? Do you have any resources to share regarding measuring impact (books, guides, websites, etc)?

Thanks! 

Kristin Antin, New Tactics Online Community Builder

kayhanirani's picture

re: measuring

I second Kristin's interest in hearing about creative ways to measure the work that is done.  We all live with the constraints of institutions (granting, government, etc.) that work from measurements and indices.  it would be wonderful to create our own indices that honor our work, but that can be translated and made meaningful to these institutions. 

 Maybe we can get something going??!!!

aabusrour's picture

Measuring

This is one of the most difficult issues I face as well, especially in some programs or projects that try to quantify impact or emotions or feeling. If measuring techniques are available for the impact of theatre in conflict zone is available, I would be happy to know more about it. And would be happy to receive your Model as well Kristin.

The difficulty I face in trying to have a measuring technique is that we don't have one dynamic factor and others are constant. The environment is volatile all the time and factors are interacting that in no way you can have a pure effect of what theatre has made or arts or education. In an occupation environment, where curfews and incursions are regular or sporadic, every day or once a month, creates a continuous environment of instability that at times you have to restart from zero.

I would be happy to hear about techniques used in such volatile circumstances, which might not be specifically for war or occupation environments. But I think this is one of the major difficulties I can see in putting a valid measurement  system of the impact of theatre.

What I tried to do for example, is to see among those who committed to theatre and arts programs for several yours, how many of them has been in confrontation with Israeli soldiers, how many of them have been injured or killed or imprisoned... In this since, those who were committed and who absorbed the idea of "Beautiful Resistance", all have been committed to it, and non of them has been imprisonned or killed or injured except 2 in our case, and their injury didn't come because of direct "violent" confrontation, One was injured by an israeli bullet in the abdomen  because he was out in a day of curfew and he was shot in the abdomen, and another was in video training program, and he was filming an Israeli incursion in the camp, so an israeli soldiers shot him,  and the bullet broke the video camera screen and injured his cheek. In this since, I could say that the committed group to trainings in arts and theatre have also been committed in their real life to this philosophy of non-violent beautiful resistance.

The difficulty is always that we are not given a time of calm where we can go in depth in things to see the fruits at the end of the road some how... We have to restart a lot of times from zero, and that is a time and energy consuming, but this is the ways things are in this part of the world.

thanks all for your great enlightenments 

.

 

 

AbdelFattah Abusrour, PhD Ashoka Fellow Director of Al-Rowwad Cultural and Theatre Training Center ____________________________________________ Alrowwad is an Independent Center for artistic, cultural, and theatre training for

max.vond's picture

assessing

I agree that  measuring impacts is very difficult - how ironic, since  the impact is so obvious to us!

Do you ever have follow-up dialogues with kids who have been in your company? One of the companies that I work with manages to keep past participants in its database and manages to contact some of them when it is time to look for stories.

I wrote my master's dissertation in 2007 on assessing theatre for development projects.  I'll find a way to make this available  to the dialogue, and anybody who's interested is welcome to have a look.  

Your work in Palestine must be so fraught  with challenges  that the last thing you want to think of is evaluations.  I sympathize! 

aabusrour's picture

Assessing

Max, Xris, Kantin and others

Hope all of you are fine after all these online dialogues. Thanks for sharing about the assessing and evaluation techniques/mechanisms/possibilities.

In Alrowwad we try to keep a database and feel the evolution of our kids who become university students and some even became board members in the organization. We do sometimes, not on regular basis however, do some dialogue session with current or old participants of our programs, especially theatre and photo/video "images for life" programs. We do notice a positive attitude in general and an impact of the "Beautiful Resistance" in their way of living and engagement in life and education and the community, with various degrees depending a lot on the family situation as well.

The instability of the situation on political level, and the continuous work on activities and giving possibilities to engage children and even adults in the activities becomes sometime a barrier to have time of reflection and assessment  of the work done. This is the same thing as well in terms of public relations and search for funding. We don't have time for that, though this is also important for organization to survive, to keep an inflow of financial resources. So, I guess with what is going on, the last thing we might think of is evaluation as Max puts it.

I think we need sometimes to slow down and reflect about what we do, and what we achieve, but I guess we listen a lot what the others are seeing and saying about what we do. We value these opinions, though are not quantified. So I guess this "temporary" model that Kantin and New tactics propose may be something that we can start to adapt.

I will read your dissertation Max and see how it goes with this assessment as well, and I remain open to any further suggestions.

Thanks you for your insights

AbdelFattah Abusrour, PhD Ashoka Fellow Director of Al-Rowwad Cultural and Theatre Training Center ____________________________________________ Alrowwad is an Independent Center for artistic, cultural, and theatre training for

Xris Reardon's picture

Measuring

I am really interested in New Tactics Work of gathering qualitative anecdotes and  attempting to quantify them using a matrix. I would love to hear more about this.

We, I am not sure if I would call it measure, but we do evaluate our work. Sometimes we do this through written feedback, sometimes through informal interviews some of which are recorded on DVD. This process of gathering - 'data' is done during all phases of the project - before the workshop / after.. And then before a performance and after (re performances the data collection has a different focus) and then finally sometime after the whole process is completed we attempt to ask participants - how they are now settling with their work.

As well as this, the audiences 'interventions' are usually also recorded, but this is usually for the benefit of the sponsoring organization so they can use the work to lobby/advocate for changes, changes that came from a community of concerned others. 

The 'data' of feedback we collect helps us to understand and reflect on our work from a participant perspective.. Recently, we also recorded, on DVD, the participants thoughts on a range of issues including: the use of ARTS for addressing difficult social issues. The comments, "participant perspective", were presented to a statewide body that lobbies for the use of the arts as a tool for community cultural development. In this case, particularly  how people living with disabilities  see the use of the arts as rising awareness  about culturallyspecific issues.

We happened to have done our interviews without knowing this survey was taking place, but when we found we asked the participants if they wanted to use their interviews to give voice, to their thoughts, in this statewide process The participants welcomed the opportunity to get their voices out, contribution on DVD which has been sent through to the organization to help, as they say - triangulate the data and mount a "case" for the use of the arts in addressing sensitive social issues. 

There is more to say but, not much time to.  Except to say, it was great to have the interviews recorded and treat this opportunity presented, from the participants perspective. They felt their voices, sharing could be extended beyond the terms of the performance, immediate  community,

Please though the info about NTP matrix is really interesting.. 

 

 

kantin's picture

New Tactics' matrix

I'd be happy to share the matrix, but just keep in mind that this is not our final version and we are still working on how to fit the wide-spread level of impact and the wide-variety of types of impact into 8 neat categories. 

Level of impact (how much did the New Tactics project ideas and resources affect the situation?):

matrix1

Type of Impact Codes (in what way was the capacity of the activist strengthened or improved by participating in the New Tactics Project?)

matrix2

Basically, we started collecting feedback from previous workshop participants and grant recipients and started to categorize the type and level of impact we were seeing. Then we coded those categories. Now we ask for feedback related to this model. Or we take general feedback and apply it to this model. Naturally, each organization would a different matrix and a different list of indicators because their goals will be much different than ours. 

We have also started to share these stories of impact, called New Tactics in Action! Check it out. 

Kristin Antin, New Tactics Online Community Builder

jtreibitz's picture

Puppetry/Theater that supports organizing/long-term change

I'm thankful for this discussion thread because it gets to the heart of the challenge that many artist/activist friends of mine (myself included) are dealing with: How can our theater work actively challenge oppression? How do we create work that can, as you said, “carry on beyond the moment, beyond the individuals”? How do make our work go beyond the symptoms of oppression to challenge its root causes for sustainable and long-term change?

For me, the way I try to do this is to link all the puppetry work I do to local grassroots organizations that are doing direct organizing work. I believe that direct organizing by people who are most directly affected by oppression (organizing driven by a deep social and political analysis/education), combined with creating an alternative culture to support that analysis and to nurture our shared social justice-oriented values is how meaningful change will happen.

As a person who has class and skin privilege, I believe my role as an artist and as an activist is to both support the work of people most directly affected by oppression, and to organize in my own community to make people aware of and encourage them to become active against oppression.

In my work this looks like:

--Teaching folks puppetry and creative organizing skills: I’m beginning to offer workshops and consultancies to groups doing organizing work so they can make their own puppets/shows or integrate theatrical elements into their organizing process. (“Theatrical elements” could include games for exploring issues, theatrical ways of doing outreach to communities, or creative ways for coming up with a campaign strategy.)

--Making shows or street theater about social justice issues and providing a way for people to be more connected to the issue at the event (which could be, depending on context: handing out flyers for a related local justice event, having a petition present that supports a campaign on the issue, having speakers from an organization present at beginning or end of show, etc)

--Supporting major events and rallies of groups doing organizing work by stilting at their event/rally or offering to make a puppet show for it.

--Including people in the creation of puppets and puppet shows—many people here in DC who are interested in my puppet stuff are often not very connected to organizing work. Getting them involved in the puppetry is one way of raising awareness of the issues and organizations that my puppetry revolves around. (Story: There was one woman who saw a show of mine about public property being privatized who came up to me afterwards wanting to learn theater skills to use in her own community. As a first step, I started inviting her to perform in future public property shows. Once, we performed at a meeting for the group who was organizing a campaign around the public property issue. We stayed for the meeting after the performance and the woman participated and subsequently got very involved in the campaign.)

--Building an audience for social justice-themed puppetry: By getting more people out to shows, I’m hoping to raise awareness of and sometimes money for effective organizing work. I also want to use shows as a forum for generally encouraging people to be aware of what’s happening locally and our responsibility in some of the issues in and around our neighborhoods. (Gentrification is one example...)

--Encourage organizers to take art and the use of culture SERIOUSLY. I do this in two ways. I have lots of conversations in which I point out to people the ways that art is dismissed in organizing and how organizing is hurt by that... I quote Amiri Baraka who said, approximately (can’t remember direct quote), “We didn’t win the civil rights movement because we didn’t learn to play the piano. We spoke to people’s heads but not to their hearts. So they eventually turned away from the movement.” I also have found that just doing puppetry at organizing events serves as a model and encourages other people to start using more artistic elements in their work. A group recently did a street theater show and told me they wouldn’t have thought about doing it if they hadn’t seen me do street shows. (Art begets art!)

I’m always trying to find more ways to use puppetry and theater along these lines. If anyone has more ideas, I’d LOVE to hear them!

kantin's picture

Using theatre/puppetry to communicate the power of these tactics

Hi Janelle,

It looks like you must be pretty busy! The  list of activities you carry out that address - both the local communities and organizations most directly affected by oppression, and also building support in other communities for the struggle against this kind of oppression - looks like a very 'holistic' approach. It looks to me like you are covering all of your bases, so to speak. 

I have never actually implemented any theatre work, but I wonder if technology could assist you in your last point - Encourage organizers to take art and the use of culture SERIOUSLY. Have you ever considered demonstrating the power of theatre and puppetry by using theatre and puppetry? This might be a very powerful way of educating organizers and other audiences on why they should consider using these tactics. Then (this is my techie-side coming out) you could videotape it, stick it on youtube and share it with a huge audience! You could even take it a step further and create plays to help activists and organizers develop their theatre-strategy. (This is something that New Tactics is currently working on to put on our website. I realize that this would require the audience to have access to computers and a good connection - but I hope it is worth the effort to assist those that do have this access, and will reach those that do not, soon!)

Just a thought... 

Kristin Antin, New Tactics Online Community Builder

jtreibitz's picture

good idea!

You know, I hadn't ever thought of that! I really shy away from anything more technological than a box-cutter knife and cardboard (participating in this dialogue was a leap of internet faith for me...), but I definitely could make a little show about why art. 

I think the question of "why use art" is pretty tied up in the question "how is art used against us?" as in, how does mainstream culture affect our values and how is it used to justify maintaining oppressive systems? and so how can we reclaim culture as a tool for liberation? that's kind of the point i want to make to organizers about why dealing directly with culture and art is critically important. and a show would be a great way to do that--funny i didn't think of it, eh? 

I have no idea at all how to make a play to help organizers develop their theatre-strategy, but I would totally love to hear what you all are thinking along those lines.

I've really only been experimenting with combining puppetry and organizing for the last two years. I'm super new at this and, as you picked up on, I'm taking on too many projects. I'm also curious what people have to say on balancing the work they are doing with their personal lives and with taking care of themselves. How do you do all this intense, personal work (to me, working in the theatrical medium feels very personal and vulnerable) and still make space for yourself to step away from it and not get too caught up in the stories you're dealing with? I guess it's just that age-old question of : How do you avoid burnout and manage your own life so you are stable enough to continue your work? I can never hear this discussion enough.

 

 

npearson's picture

Self care - Taking care of our best resource!

Janelle,

Thank you so much for bringing up this very important and so often neglected aspect of human rights work - the need to take care of our best resource, OURSELVES!  The New Tactics project here at the Center for Victims of Torture seeks to find opportunities to share the wisdom we have gained from providing rehabilitation services to survivors of torture. 

We talk of the ABCs of self care:

A - Awareness - this is an awareness of the whole self. For example, becoming aware of how you carry stress in your body, voice, emotions, spirit and attitude toward your self and others.

B - Balance -  this is how you balance your work, rest and play. People may think that for those involved in theatre that by the very nature of the expressiveness and use of body in theater that you have work and play coming together. This may be true for some and not for others. The key is finding the balance that works best for you.

C - Connection - this takes in both the awareness and balance aspects as well, because it entails how you connect with the people who are important in your life. Do you spend so much time doing your human rights work that you have no time left in the day for your spouse, children, extended family, friends? 

These aspects of awareness, balance and connection provide opportunities for us to maintain connections to people who are not part of our regular human rights networks and offer us a much needed respite from the work as well as different perspectives on our communities and life in general. We might begin to feel that those not involved in human rights work don't understand the seriousness or critical importance of issues. The opportunities to build in awareness, balance and connection can help us to see when our view of the world may taking on a more "dark" or pessimistic view (a potential sign of burnout) and reminding us to take time to re-connect to the people, places, things that bring us joy, humor and hope.

One of the first steps in self care is recognition and acceptance that taking care of ourselves is important for continuing the work. It is not only worthy of our time, energy and commitment, it is essential.

For some more information, a New Tactics community member shared some blog posts on this topic of self care this past summer. Here are also two very good resources:

Saakvitne, K. W. & Pearlman, L.A. (1996). Transforming the pain: A workbook on vicarious traumatization. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc. Stamm, H. B. (Ed.). (1995). Secondary traumatic stress: Self-care issues for clinicians, researchers, and educators. Lutherville, Maryland: Sidran Press.

Nancy Pearson, New Tactics in Human Rights Program Manager

kantin's picture

Online dialogues + reflection = self-care?

Hi Janelle, 

I'm so glad that my idea might be helpful for you. I like your idea of developing a show about the importance of dealing directly with culture and art! If you need any tips on how to use video to disseminate this show online, you could take a look at our past dialogue on 'using video for advocacy' or go to WITNESS's website - the HUB - for video tutorials on how to create a video. 

Regarding self-care, I agree with Nancy's comment on the importance of this aspect of human rights work.  It is my hope that this interactive website can be used as a way for practitioners to practice self-care. For example, these online dialogues give practitioners the opportunity to share their stories, ideas, challenges and successes with fellow practitioners. How often do we have the chance to brag about the success stories of our work? I think it is important to take a minute to reflect on the hard work you have done and what you have accomplished - and these dialogues allow you to do that. And at the same time - inspire other practitioners!

Another great aspect of this website regarding self-care and communication among practitioners, are our 'groups'. A group allows gives practitioners a space to communicate and collaborate with other group members privately. 

I would be happy to get a 'theatre practitioners' group started for you all if you are interested. Let me know!

Kristin Antin, New Tactics Online Community Builder

max.vond's picture

possibilities for dialogue...

Hi all,

I'm deeply interested by this thread about inter-dialogues, the question of peace-building, the danger of reifying separation through working with it. I'm not sure where I'll go with this, but here are some thoughts.

It is undeniable that 'working together' can be a P.C., easy 'solution' to questions that run as deep as identity. If we're thinking about Israel/Palestine, or the Sudanese context, we're talking about questions of who we are and how our struggle against each other defines us. There's no painless way to just drop that kind of thing in the interest of an arts project. It occurs to me that, say, for my Sudanese participants to drop the conflict which they'd inherited, it would have meant uprooting a strong sense of their personal identity -for the Southerners, the inherited mistrust of Northern Sudanese who were connected to the government's 40 years of pillaging, for the Northerners, the inherited stigma against Southerners as uneducated, barbaric, a-religious, and dangerous rebels.

But then again, why not? The way I see it, common identities - communities - are formed by pools of shared information. Sudanese are Sudanese by virtue of the fact that they all know/experience a common reality. Even if they are enemies, there's a lot that they still have in common. I believe that through sharing new experiences and new information, this can be developed and strengthened. I choose to be romantic about optimism, as Sanjoy Ganguli, a theatre-maker who heads a T.O. movement in India, would say.

On a realistic note, however, you have to consider where you begin. I'm talking about peace-making with theatre or story-telling in a war context. You have to begin with the reality, which is the conflict itself. You can't jump to cooperation, scenes of sweet nothings whispered by unreal characters across the great divide. You have to start with an image of what you have, the conflict that you have.

That's why the idea of 'Beautiful Resistance', which I've first encountered here in this dialogue, seems correct to me. It sounds to me like this is actually the beginning of an artistic mediation of the conflict. I would love to see a counter-gesture from the other side - some kind of 'Beautiful Occupation'. If the oppressors are committed enough to their identities and the actions which these imply, can't they also represent themselves to the other as such?

I guess it all comes back to some simple principles - let each side tell its story fully, and grant the story a full and respectful listening.

But I don't think you can work with both parties to a conflict in the same room at the same time, from the beginning. I don't know if there's a way to coordinate a peace-exchange as an outsider. It brings in the issue of the arrogant facilitator. The only thing you can do, probably, is establish and hold a space in which both narratives can be told. Provide neutral ground, as it were. In a lot of applied theatre work, perhaps all, we're only fostering dialogues, that's all we can do, and as many here have said in different ways, all you can really do to get the right story to emerge is to give the right opportunity.

this is a really theoretical bit of thought - that's me on a Sunday morning! thank you all for your insights and experience, which are all so humbling.

aabusrour's picture

Dialogue possibilities

Salam to all

Max, I think this is an important and fundamental thing of having the 2 versions. The freedom of expression and telling the stories for both sides whether we agree with or not is critical and important, and this is also n important issue in human rights.

It is important as artists, practitioners, facilitators and human beings to give a space of expression. In the same time, use the same principles of human rights to evaluate  the 2 versions and deal with the basic principles of justice in order to arrive to reconciliation and possibility to work with both sides.

When I talked about Beautiful Resistance, I talked about "finding the peace within" before talking about the peace with the enemy. This is an important issue for people who tell their story, they need to hear and see that they are fully listened to and heard. That they are able say whatever they want without restrictions or courtesy or diplomacy however brut that might seem or appear. People have a lot of history behind them and even if it is for one time of their life, they should get things out as they want and as they feel. Otherwise, it will be just hypocrisy over hypocrisy, and we will remain in this ping pong game of accusations and frustrations and sending responsibilities one over the other.

Principle of justice are clear, and in any story there are 2 sides, and the 2 sides should be able to express themselves aside until all this "cloud" is out of their chests, then it might be a possibility to start talking about common work. I guess this a minimum kind of respect for the history of both sides.

thanks

AbdelFattah Abusrour, PhD Ashoka Fellow Director of Al-Rowwad Cultural and Theatre Training Center ____________________________________________ Alrowwad is an Independent Center for artistic, cultural, and theatre training for

aabusrour's picture

Theatre and reconciliation

Hi Magan

Good to read you as well. I think that the issue of Israelis and Palestinians work together was largely discussed in the sense that yes, people want to have good conscience and a lot of money was expended for putting Palestinian kids and Israeli kids and young people in Europe or the USA for 10 days or 2 weeks together is such neutral environment.

My work with Palestinians is to leave them a choice if they want to do it or not. But in the same time, as Palestinian living under Israeli apartheid segregation system, where even if these kids go in Europe and US and do things together, they will come back and be separated again and nothing will happen, Just last week, there was a article about these project where millions have been spent, with any successful joint work from all these sessions.

The land here is not neutral. My feeling was that, these kids were treated like the monkeys of the circus, that it would be a miracle to have a palestinian and israeli shake hands on stage, that peace is created in such environment, There is nothing in terms of human beings that make a Palestinian and Israeli kill each other when they see each other even in Palestine and Israel. But in the same time, there is a lot which separate these kids from each other, and disable them from going a head with normal human relations. There is nothing normal in the environment they live in that could make their relation normal, and so make them "normalize" their relation with each other.

My objective with the Beautiful Resistance is to help our kids find the peace within, before talking about the peace with the other... which is of course extremely difficult in a time where even 60 years after the Nakba and Israeli occupation, there are still incursions in AIda camp and all Palestinian cities by the Israelis, there are still people killed or arrested, and there is nothing normal that leave a little bit of calm in the life people to think about living normal life and normal neighborhood. The word peace have been overused that it doesn't mean anything anymore, and it is important at least for us to restore a value to this "Peace" to find its true meaning.

Yes Magan, I guess in injustice time, under occupation, it is not appropriate to follow the crowd because they want to feel happy, we are not diplomatic or politicians who search to please others. We have to please our kids to start with, and help remove the injustice so that they can go as equal with others to be the partners in creating a change, and not as inferior, or subject to a charity action to invite the poor palestinian to be present. What is difficult sometimes is that most of the time, when Israelis are invited, it is not important to invite a Palestinian, but when a Palestinian is invited for a speech or a conference, usually to make it justified or politically correct, an Israeli is invited... and this is humiliating. I guess in theatre and reconciliation, things have to be treated neutrally and equally. Theatre is never about Balance. Theatre is not about giving answers but rather about irritating with questions and initiate discussion and motivate audience to find the answers. Sometimes people ask me to present the Israeli point of view in my plays, to be balanced. This is not my role. No one would ask a south african to present the whites point of view or an oppressed to present the point of view of the oppressor, but when it comes to Israel/Palesine, it is always another thing.... and this is not easy to deal with. But we deal with it as I think we should in a way that respect our people, their suffering and the sacrifices they have to make and live during the past 60 years. 

AbdelFattah Abusrour, PhD Ashoka Fellow Director of Al-Rowwad Cultural and Theatre Training Center ____________________________________________ Alrowwad is an Independent Center for artistic, cultural, and theatre training for

Mohammad Waseem's picture

Theatre For reconciliation

Hi, it is a difficult question. I don’t know when is the right time to start forum theatre in a conflict situation is. I can share one story, last year I got an opportunity to work with journalist from India and Pakistan in Nepal. Workshop was organized by PANOOS and they invited 10 journalist from Indian Kashmir and 10 from Pakistani Kashmir. Initially it was very difficult to find common ground to build a play but when we reverse the role (Indian pretended to be Pakistani and Pakistani pretended to be Indian) and start improvising the play. It was great, it provides an opportunity to understand how they perceive each other. The other important point is the interaction as a spect-actor there was learning how to move forward. That was a great experience. There was a better understanding among the participants and they suggested how to move forward. That performance was for a small selective audience. That is essential to start with when trust level improved we can do lot more experiments.

 

aabusrour's picture

Reconciliation and theatre

Salam Waseem and all. It is and remains indeed a difficult question. Again the question also remains how critical this meeting between the 2 sides might be considered by your community. The idea of being in the other side shoes is great, and helps break stereotypes. I guess the difficulty in our situation Palestine/Israel (and it might be the same or not for India/Pakistan or Tibet/China and other countries) that in general Palestinian meeting Israelis in such workshops are either traitors or at least doing normalization relations  with the enemy, and mostly be interpreted mostly in the international community as the good Israelis are doing a great effort and generosity in talking with Palestinians. For Some Israelis, those Israelis who meet with Palestinians might be called as well traitors and be subject to severe criticism. So the issues here go beyond the groups that participate, but has an impact that might be long on these participants after they return form a workshop in their own communities.

There has been some plays done with joint Israeli and Palestinians, musical orchestras some of which are still on. but the possibilities that these people continue to see and work with each other are almost inexistent, for the simple reason that things are going from bad to worse on the ground. There is a hope that a bigger effect could be achieved through theatre and arts, of things calm down or stabilize in a positive since... until then, I guess we need to continue working on making a better impact in the individual communities and maybe challenge them to put themselves in the shoes of their enemy.

 

 

 

AbdelFattah Abusrour, PhD Ashoka Fellow Director of Al-Rowwad Cultural and Theatre Training Center ____________________________________________ Alrowwad is an Independent Center for artistic, cultural, and theatre training for

Xris Reardon's picture

Witnesing

HI Max, 

I am really glad you raised the issues you did around witnessing. I came to community theatre through an interest in social change.. I started out as a participant interested in how theatre could be used to give voice too, represent, marginalized or silenced realities. I worked under a director, a fantastic  artist. I learnt a tremendous amount about theatrical discipline. There was mastery in the room. However, working with an artist, as a non professional actor, I was left with a lot of questions coming out the other end. Questions about process, what is a safe process, and ethical process, who are we making plays for, whose story are we telling, whose visions are we serving.

For me now, as a practitioner of FORUM theatre,  I give thanks I have an embodied knowing of what it means to be a participant in the 'work' / room. With this experience behind me, but still in me, I am still coming at these questions only from a different perspective. Questions about the purpose of the work, in this case, of FOURM theatre, it's role, who it serves, the role of a practitioner, the joker, how much do we need to know about the issues; process vs product, safety, respect, honoring participants stories, learning to listen, valuing listening, and ultimately questioning our assumptions, having the humility to know we don't know, can't know, is critical.

Yes, it is a slippery dance in the room for all, hence again, the need for a well  thought through methodology that attempts to account for this 'dance'.  The dance of depicting (painful/violent) lived experiences, giving witness to struggles in order to generate community insight, strategies and tactics to address change.  I have certainly worked with some great FORUM artists who have helped fine tune my thinking around this, shared some methods to help articulate to organizations the question of  process vs product. Now when I am invited to work with communities I state from the outset that plays will ONLY GO AHEAD if that's participants want.  My experience is that when the struggle starts to be investigated, named in the room, there is an equal investment on behalf of participants to have their stories told - to tell the symbolic truth to an audience.

Currently, I  see Forum Theatre as a medium for investigating hard issues, giving witness to human rights violations. Tools, techniques, ones choices need to assist individuals to safely step into the work, through building group bonds, trust, and focus, in order for the work to go deep.  In the case of a recent project on youth at risk around substance abuse - static images, a frozen snap shot in time were made.  As the facilitator, in the workshop, my role was to ask the audience (not the group that made the images)  "if we are inside a moment of struggle around drugs and alcohol what do we see? where are we? who are the players? what are the relationship to each other?  In the case of this project, The image was: A young man lying on the floor. Someone kneeling beside him with his head in his hands. A woman standing with her back to the scene. Two other girls hugging each other. The participants, after offering ideas re: the above, stood next to a characters who struggle they understood. I then asked them to say  what they wanted or what they wished for as characters*, some said for "it too all go back to normal" - " for it to go back to the way it was" - the boy kneeling on the ground said: "he wished he had never given his brother the shards".  This image was symbolic, not real. Participants were reading it as a moment inside a struggle but  the naming came from truth (* this process, of asking what characters want was taught to me by Headlines Theatre).

In the case of this project, this space to speak was critical to these young people. The depiction of young people at risk, as they argued, is totally restrictive - damaging. They feel they are only ever depicted as delinquents without anything to offer, or give back, with out anyone asking why, how they arrived to where they are at. As they said: "there is no one to talk to about your fears, no one that understand or is interested, not even your friends". The content of the plays they ended up making touched this theme.

They find the plays. I don't come up with the plays, that's the groups work. However, as I move from workshop facilitator to director my job becomes to ensure what gets put on stage is truthful to the accounts shared, to make sure the work is believable as a piece of FOURM theatre. Almost always, the plays are powerful because they are authentic, a  'symbolic' account that express truths, comes from the community. When I joke plays, I guess I feel it is not necessarily my job to know the answers but to deeply care, and to remain curious about the strategies and tactics the community names to effect change and to encourage dialogue.

Anyway, some thoughts, around my experiences in trying to deal with the questions, concerns you raised - very important questions indeed - let's keep the conversation going...whoops seem while I have been writing this - thats what happened. GREAT

 

 

Mohammad Waseem's picture

waseem Hi Max/xris, Thanks

waseem Hi Max/xris, Thanks for bringing a very important issue in the forum. It is so crucial to have a clear understanding of the issue on which you want to prepare a theatre on. Not only your knowledge on the issue is necessary rather you should have very clear objective on what you want to achieve from the theatre performance. I want to emphasis on the point that we should know the strengths and limitations of theatre. We can bring the issue to a larger audience through theatre and by adapting forum theatre as our tool and explore various solutions to our social problems. It must be remembered that change in real life can be achieved through political process (organized struggle). I always try to be realistic in a process to build a play based on the local stories. I can share the methodology; we start from social mapping from individual to a group and then a critical debate in plenary and finally the participants select the issue they want to work on through voting. It is important that the performers have some direct link to the issue or have adequate knowledge for an appropriate response can only be obtained when the audience can relate with the issue. There is another important point relating to the language of the play. Language is not only for communication rather it links with your identity. I had experienced words have different meaning in different cultures and situations. In Pakistan situation language becomes more important where we are living in multicultural and multilingual society. In addition to this most of the people think in images not in words. While developing a theatre if people can relate with the image then it is much easy for them to participate. In many situations they are exploring the collective image of community, society or the world for which they can struggle. lastly if we want to bring a change or any transformation there must be critical dialogue and an organized struggle. Theatre is great I loved it but theatre alone cannot transform the community or the world.

Anna Weekes's picture

Language barriers

Hi Waseem, you touched on the point that sometimes language can mean such different things to different cultural groups even within a single country, especially where there are many indigenous languages and the common language that is spoken through the government is only taught in schools to those who can afford it.

 In this instance I find it a valuable tool to work in images, allowing the performers who come from the community to explore the images that they find illustrate the sense of the issue that they want to discuss. We begin with basic Image Theatre activities that allows all members to be an actor and a director. We will usually begin with an accurate tableaux of society that highlights the issue being explored. As we go through remolding  the tableaux, looking at the ways which family and community are affected and showing this in the image we begin to get an idea of how we will show the impact of an issue by giving a sense of the emotion that it provokes, for example working with drug users, they wanted to show the alienation from the discrimination that they receive, we began with images of them in the street being kicked and bullied, then it moved to this incredible image of them being purely forgotten, trying to call out for help though just being ignored and trodden over, which is often the case. This image spoke to a whole population who may experience discrimination, not just drug users.

This breaks down the barriers of language that can intimidate audiences and it is also necessary when you have an outdoor audience that can be as large as 2000 people, microphones just don't cut it.  

 Though there is a place for language in all theatre, physicalisation and imagery can cross those boundaries. 

 

 

Mohammad Waseem's picture

Language and Image

Hi Anna,

You are right Image can break the barriers. There is one small point images do have their own limitations. We can create those images that we have in our imagination. An image can have different meanings for urban and rural. Language can transport our thoughts and most of the people thought in images. For me language is more than communication. It is linked with our identity.  I tried to address this question by improvising the forum script in bi lingual or multi lingual languages. Spect-actors have the freedom to do the interaction in a language he/she feel comfortable. We can do the translation if required.

 

aabusrour's picture

Languages and images

Hi friends

Sorry I had troubles with internet yesterday so I joint today with beautiful surprise of this flow of ideas and thoughts in the discussion.

I guess Waseem and Annie have emphasized  on the use of image and importance of language. It is sure that images remain with people much longer and more easily than words, especially for young audiences, and for foreign audiences. We usually tour in Europe and the US, and we have always to think about communication, because as Waseem says, language is also about identity. We used subtitles that are projected on screen during the performances, but we tried always to minimize the words and work more on the images and movements and body expressions.

In our last play,  "Blame the Wolf" we tackled the issue of stereotypes and how there is always 2 sides of each story, and people should be aware to listen to the 2 sides before judging one another. Kids and adults know the story of little red ridding hood and the Wolf, the three little goats (or pigs in Western culture) and the Wolf, Hansel and Gretel. So this play took these stories where we see the little Red accusing the Wolf of eating her grandmother. The village chief asks the guard to arrest the wolf and invites others who have stories with the wolf like the 3 little goats, Hansel and Gretel, and of course Little Red. The wolf wants others to hear his side of the story, because jury starts saying that "we never heard of a good wolf, the wolf is bad and he surely ate the grand mother and he should be punished". So we listen to the goats who seem not sure what the wolf wanted: whether he was so hungry he could eat them or eat anything. Hansel and Gretel (Habib and Nada in Arabic) thank the wolf for saving them from the Witch. The witch to take revenge disguises in wolf and sleeps in the bed of the grandmother who happened to be her sister, who she send in vacation to the Dead Sea to have her house for revenge.

SO once about to say the sentence, the grandmother arrives, and thanks her sister the witch who seems very angry for her coming at the wrong moment. Some of the jury say that regardless of this, the wolf is bad, and if he didn't eat the grand mother of little red, he surely ate the grandmother of someone else. Little red also refuses to recognize that she was wrong because her mother always warned her from the bad wolf. The witch however says that she has suffered from stereotypes and she did the same with the wolf, so she apologizes from the wolf. And a young woman in the jury as well asks the others to listen to the wolf because it is clear that he is innocent in this case. Bust of course some people keep stuck to the stereotypes regardless if they are right or wrong.

The point I want to say is that, sometimes it is easier to break the language barrier sometimes with stories that the people are familiar with and explain to them what is going on in actions, and maybe have a discussion later about what they understood and how they see the things performed  for them. Children seem much more reactive to images than adults, and connect with stories easier.

 

 

 

AbdelFattah Abusrour, PhD Ashoka Fellow Director of Al-Rowwad Cultural and Theatre Training Center ____________________________________________ Alrowwad is an Independent Center for artistic, cultural, and theatre training for

kayhanirani's picture

How to tell your own story

Max brings up a good point about the role of the facilitator, especially one from the "outside" who most often has much baggage, privilege, and expectations.  The case of the Sudanese Romeo and Juliet is a situation that has occurred  1000 times over, in 1000+ places.  The constant reminder that we facilitators must give ourselves is that the people we work with are there to tell the story they want to share, and we have to help them do that.  It isn't up to us to get them to tell the story we want to hear.

Oftentimes, outside facilitators coming into a community might have ideas about what's going on, what's "edgy" or "important" about the place we are working in, but like the forum theater for the homeless, we can't create a show based on what interests us, it has to interest the community. 

When I was in Iraq doing theater with children, none of them created scenes of war atrocities or the like.  Their scenes were of school, of teacher disrespect, of student conflict.  My idea that these children are living in a war zone and need theater to help them talk about that was totally inappropriate to enforce.  They were dealing with their issues, and these were the issues they had the courage to face at that time.  I don't doubt that the longer I would have stayed and worked we would have discovered scenes of trauma from war - but at that moment - school was where they were and I had to honor it.

missmagan's picture

Culturally appropriate theatre

This is the subject I was just addressing in reply to Abed's post about why he feels it's not appropriate to do joint theatre projects with Israelis at this time for Palestinians.  As a white person working primarily with marginalized communities - refugee/immigrant youth, incarcerated youth, inner-city youth - cultural appropriateness is something I think about a lot.  Invariably, any such project I work on will have minority race students let by white teachers.  Minority teaching artists in St. Louis are almost non-existent, and minority actors are just as rare.  And I find that my instinct is to direct the children towards an 'appropriate' ending for their plays or monologues that they write - give it a positive ending, a hopeful ending - when, most of the time, especially with incarcerated youth - they simply do not want to.  And when I do let go, and let the decided what it is they want to say, and how it should end - they fly.  Unfortunately, this approach is not favored by administrations or boards.  The administration at the juvenile detention center where I work wants the youth to stay away from discussing topics like gang violence, drugs, crime, etc.  They are uncomfortable when the youth present a play, such as the one we just did, entitled From a Savage to A Saint, that has a bleak, i.e. realistic ending - a kid gets caught up in gang life, attacks a random student at the high school in order to "earn his stripes", i.e. be accepted into the gang, this random student that was beat up is someone who is beat up fairly regularly for being a good student, and one day he snaps and takes his father's gun to school and shoots a bunch of people.  Throughout, the characters discussed the advantages and disadvantages of being a 'savage' or a 'saint'. The students took pride in performing it, their fellow inmates loved it so much they requested a second performance, and we had a really interesting discussion afterwards about personal vs. social responsibility for actions.  Yet, the play makes the administration squeamish because it is so violent.

aabusrour's picture

telling the story

Hi Kayhan.

It is great to see you on this dialogue and since the time we met in New York we didn't get a chance to meet. I guess as Palestinian who have worked with international volunteers coming to our Alrowwad center, especially those who come with a project, have some troubles in the sense that some of them have a set of results that they want to achieve. This is not wrong in itself to hope to achieve a result of the work you want to offer. But in the same time, sometimes ignorance of the culture and the way people live and things go in this country, could lead to difficulties in dealing with things. I agree with you that people in war zones would mostly go towards "normal life" things, like school, friends, parents, teachers...etc. They go around the violence, war, occupation issues. I guess one of the most dangerous and difficult things under such circumstances is that such situation becomes "Normal", and people become "Used to it" as they would say. So that become routine thing to have shooting, people killed or injured or imprisoned. When kids in Palestine talk about how there school mates where killed or injured, sometimes they tell it with a laugh and a smile is if it was a joke or a play that happened in front of their eyes. They seem sometimes to go in another level of imagination and forget the hard reality. When they are a bit order, they start reflecting more, but still, even for adult Palestinians, they would say "We are used to it" where it refers to occupation, or going around a checkpoint.

I had in the troop one girl, who mother was killed on March 8th 2002, during one of the incursions of Israeli soldiers in Aida camp-Bethlehem, The soldiers at that time where digging through the walls to pass from one house to the other, and when they arrive to a street, they go and explode the door facing them to get in the house. So they exploded the door where part of it hit the mother who was about to open the door when she heard the noise. She was deeply injured and soldiers didn't allow the husband to call the ambulance until 2 hours later. And it took the ambulance one hour to arrive during the curfew forced on the camp. The soldiers continued digging through the walls of their house to pass into the neighbor’s house. This girl, Woud is her name (means Promises) joined the theatre troop in September 2002, and it wasn't until a performance in 2006 that she wrote a scene talking about her mother, and her willingness to continue the resistance through theatre and arts. Later 2 of her sisters also joined Alrowwad in the choir and dance troops. 

Sometimes need longtime to be able to narrate their story or talk about things. Others can talk more easily. I guess it is a kind of self-protection or self-defense. When we work in theatre or arts, we need to be patients. We need I guess to see what are the priorities of the groups we work with and what they want to deliver with our guidance as facilitators and with respect to what they think.

The other day, I was in a workshop about non-violence, and the trainer asked a question, and when one of the trainees responded, she just said "you are wrong, you should think this, this and that". As facilitators or trainers, I guess we need to lead others to the answer and not dictate an answer to them. I think this is important to respect the thought of the people and not to dictate a code of conduct on them.

 

AbdelFattah Abusrour, PhD Ashoka Fellow Director of Al-Rowwad Cultural and Theatre Training Center ____________________________________________ Alrowwad is an Independent Center for artistic, cultural, and theatre training for

prugell's picture

listening with an active but quiet mind

 I'm appreciating the honesty of people talking about your experiences of coming to a project with your own your own ideas about what you hope or expect are the themes a community that you’re working with want to raise and talk about. I think when discussing our learnings as facilitators of theatre for social change it can be great to share our learnings that stem from our weaknesses. In the case of facilitators coming to work a community with our own ideas I guess that is a factor that is quite likely to ultimately weaken a process that has the potential to support social change, for example, of human rights.  

Particularly around the time when first began to facilitate Theatre of the Oppressed (TO) processes, but unfortunately not only then, I can think of a number of examples of times where I’ve worked with groups where I came with my own agenda about what I hoped and expect would be the themes that the community would raise and want to address. One example that leaps to mind is when I was facilitating TO processes as an 'outsider'  with young women who were refugees from Sudan and Liberia. I knew that their communities, and especially young people in their communities, were facing much racism and racially motivated attacks in their new town but the issues that they focus on was girls gossiping and school. It took a while too put aside my expectations of what would be discussed and instead facilitate and watch and experience their stories emerging…  what I should have been doing all along. 

Of course every time I work with a group I’m reminded of the absolute importance to listen, really listen. I often work with Indigenous peoples Northern Australia and I’m constantly reminded, day to day, to enter spaces with open eyes and ears, be quiet, wait, wait some more and listen.  I know those moments that I’m really listening. For me it means open ears and eyes but also a quiet mind. Settling my restless mind that wants big social change where there’s social and environmental justice, just settle my mind, listen and be genuinely present facilitating TO processes and whatever they support to emerge.  

Rather than looking for threads of stories that hints to what I view or perceive as the ‘root causes”/”key issues” actually listen and learn. When facilitating every time that I let go of my assumptions I’m reminded of how essential this is if I want to engage respectfully with the communities that I work with. Actually making a space for people to let their stories emerge and be heard and as you say Annie ‘support a community to find what they want to express, they feel is important to them. 

Xris Reardon's picture

listening

Pru, I really understand and get the part about listening and the way refer to it. I guess as one of our most significant tools. I really see, in working with communities, even if one goes in with a focalizing lens..(an issue)..it is the truth of the communities exp - even if divergent from the issue - as an issue is not one dimensional anyway, only able to be understood and represented one way.. i.e - experiences of homophobia (one of the projects I worked on) arise from so many variables and factors...and this, multiplicity of narratives..."is what needs fostering" ..It's great to hear this perspective re: about whose stories ?? shared by you and yes, so many others contributing. Thanks.

npearson's picture

Witnessing - stories, action and transformation

Max, Waseem, Kahan, Xris and others,

I am profoundly struck by your comments regarding the various processes of "witnessing" that you each shared. In my professional  field of social work, we often speak about the role and power of the "parallel process" - or what was originally referred to as a "reflective space" between a supervisor and someone they are supervising - where feelings, behaviors and issues emerge within that space that "parallel" the process taking place between a social worker and their client. 

The reason that I bring this up - is that I have been so struck by how theater can be such a powerful tool for naming (explicitly or symbolically) issues; providing a space for the "actors" and the "audience" to face these issues; creatively interact with the issues and potentially transform reactions and behavior (individually and collectively); and how the interaction between the "actors" on stage as well as their interaction with the audience is also a kind of "parallel process" - both reflecting real life experience.

I have also been moved by your reflections on how important it is for the participants working to create these plays interact and lead the process. That is also an important aspect of other forms of therapeutic work (and theater is clearly therapeutic). The development  of trust, pace and direction of the process rests with the individual/group and the therapist (or facilitator/director in theater) provides the "container" that allows the safe space for the exploration, insight and transformation to take place.

Thank you so much for providing such in-depth thoughts, reflections and experiences. 

Nancy Pearson, New Tactics in Human Rights Program Manager

Annie Sloman's picture

Facilitating not dictating

Thanks for that Max.  I think that's a really good example of what is so easy to do.  Often as a theatre practitioner  or human rights work or whoever you are going into a community and working with theatre (as well as other tools), its so easy to go in with an already established ideas of what you may want, or alternatively  ideas of quality and what a 'theatre' piece should be.  I think the best practitioners are those that are true facilitators, that support and help guide the community to find what they want to express and how about things that they feel are important to them.  So often we go in with wanting to create something that is cutting edge, life changing and often if the theatre piece is part of a specific project already have set ideas about a particular topic and what needs to be shown.  But as you say making a space and time to tell there storey, which may be something completely  different from what you had imagined with completely  different outcomes.  

I've also found from experience  that letting go of the theatrical conventions that I consider 'good' and embracing what the group want to do(though try and open them to new ideas as well).  In Timor-Leste there is a tradition of 'soap opera' realist based theatre, with what I like to call talking heads, i find it quite a boring form of theatre but it is the form that people naturally create there and audiences love.  I have had to learn to let go and support people making styles of theatre that i don't always think are the most interesting  (this is me also recognizing  the different cultural experiences I have had to develop my own personal taste in theatre!) and support them making the best quality in this style possible, as there is no use putting effort into changing something if the only thing it achieves is appeasing my own personal taste, while simultaneously potentially disempowering those that i am pushing to change.  This is not saying that I don't share and encourage different styles, but I am conscious about when it is an appropriate time and when are people genuinely open to it (ie is it because i want that change to happen, or are the group actually wanting some new input).

So yes facilitating not dictating, easy to say, hard to do, but extremely important

aabusrour's picture

Why use theatre?

As a Palestinian, born under Israeli occupation, in a refugee camp where there are very limited possibilities for self-expression. The general stereotypes are that Palestinians are only capable of throwing stones or burning car tires, or that they are born with genes of hatred or violence, or terrorism. They are considered not as victims of occupation but as the oppressor and the public enemy. Deprived from their rights and lands, its them who should do the compromises, and not the occupier. The Palestinian cause was transformed as well into humanitarian cause, treating people as needy of assistance and charity and not as people who need political and legal support and dignity. In the same time, on the Palestinian side, the continuous occupation has lead to more extreme actions which lead to use of armed struggle and exploding oneself to kill others to make their voice heard.

On one side, we don't want our people and children to be numbers on lists of martyrs and handicapped for the rest of their lives, or perish in Israeli jails, and in the same time we don't want them to think that the only way to resists is through violence, because with all the justice of our cause, one people use violence, they lose part of their humanity.

I founded Alrowwad theatre in Aida refugee camp, which has no playgrounds or green spaces, which is surrounded by huge Israeli colonies, watch and snipers tours, and the illegal 8 meters high wall of separation from the East, North and part of the Western sides of the camp, and which is still subject of Israeli incursions until today. I focused on the use of arts in general and started with Theatre in particular which remains the main program of work to allow beautiful self expression to break the stereotypes and show another image of this beauty and humanity of our children and people, the folklore and culture.

The program was very successful. We invented the "Beautiful Resistance" against the ugliness of occupation and its violence, a nonviolent mean of self expression and defense of our humanity and refusal to be put in a corner where we respond to violence by violence, because we want to keep this humanity in us.

I have worked with university students, schools, kindergardens and adults. We have made international tours to create bridges and relations on international level, in Sweden, Denmark, Egypt, USA, France and Belgium. The idea is that theatre is a change maker on individual level and audience level. It is also a direct relation between the actor and audience, where possibilities of exchange and discussion could take place after the shows.

For Palestinian children, when they see people applauding them, and encourage them to continue in this way, that this kind of non-violent and beautiful resistance   delivers the message and represent another image of their country. then of course it does encourage them to continue doing theatre and be involved even in training others.

 

 

AbdelFattah Abusrour, PhD Ashoka Fellow Director of Al-Rowwad Cultural and Theatre Training Center ____________________________________________ Alrowwad is an Independent Center for artistic, cultural, and theatre training for

Mohammad Waseem's picture

Why Theatre

 

Forum theatre (in Pakistan we use the term interactive theatre) it provided us an opportunity to discuss analyze and try to find out practical solution of a problem by engaging spectators. Forum theatre is not a agitprop theatre rather it present the perspective of both protagonist and antagonist and raised the question for the spectators to address them as spect-actor” in forum theatre we present anti model and asked the spectators response about the decision made on stage and motivate them to change it . This provides a safe space for the performers and spectators to engage in a dialogue without being defensive.

If I look back there are few stories those gave me a lot of strength and energy to continue my work in the field of human rights. Five years ago a play was improvised with Sandal theatre group on the issue of power loom workers (textile industry to make yarn and cloths) in Faislabad. There were around half a million workers and none of them were registered with social security department, because all of them were informal labor no trade unions. The workers those were registered to social security department can get free medical services, education services for their children and get monetary benefit in case of accidents, death etc. The play was developed on this them while discussing why those workers did not have social security cards, linking with Government promises for welfare of workers, government officials attitude and employer fears  (if they registered the workers they have to pay more taxes)  etc. Theatre was performed in front of workers and leaders of different trade unions. There was very interesting dialogue was generated and many question were asked.  Trade union leaders decided to take this issue rather for more increase in wages.

From that point they started their struggle, processions, hunger strike, press conferences doing seminars to engage civil society and media. Some of them were arrested, few of them injured but they continue their struggle. As the result of the movement initiated through this year Federal Government have been forced for policy legislation  to provide social security cards to power loom workers and till today more than six thousand  workers got the cards and hopefully all of them will get the cards in this year.

There is an important thing to remind theatre can high light the issue, raised questions but we can bring the changes through organized struggle (political process). There must be an organization who is taking the lead on the issue you must have local organizations those were struggling for their rights. Theatre can supplement their efforts, helping them to communicate to a larger audience and helping them to create a collective image for which they struggle to achieve. We are documenting the case studies with next ten days it will be available on our website www.irc.org

    

 

kgowhari's picture

Re: [New Tactics Dialogues: Using Theatre for Human Rights Educa

Hi Everyone   My name is Kowsar Gowhari and I live in US. I am carefully following the discussions and I am really enjoying them since I am new to the field. Some of you did not mention your names and places. I appreciate if you share your name and email address with the rest of community members if you want to!   Especially, I really found the email about one of the member's experience in London and Sudan useful and I appreciate if you send me your contact info so I can ask you more question about your works.   my email is : kowsarjamshidiatyahoo [dot] com   Thank you so much.   Cheers,   Kowsar Gowhari

kantin's picture

How to contact practitioners

Hello Kowsar,

Thank you for your comment. I'm glad that you heard about this dialogue and that you are finding it interesting and helpful. 

You can contact the practitioners directly on this website without needing their email address.

  1. First, login to www.newtactics.org. login
  2. Click on their username (which will be blue if you are logged in). (for example, your username is 'kgowhari' and you should see it in blue - this is a link to your 'biography')username
  3. Click on the 'Contact' tab and write your message. This message will be sent to the practitioner's email address!

 contact tab I hope this helps!

Welcome to the New Tactics online community, Kowsar!

Kristin Antin, New Tactics Online Community Builder

npearson's picture

Sharing contact information

Thank you Kowsar for raising the desire to directly connect with people sharing their ideas and experiences in this dialogue and who are part of the New Tactics community.

I want to thank Kristin for creating such an easy to use visual guide.

You CAN easily contact a person who is participating in the dialogue directly and still maintain the privacy and confidentiality of each person even as we connect with the other members. New Tactics strives to provide both the ability to connect with each other as well as the privacy of all our New Tactics community members.

I hope this information will help you and others to connect with other New Tactics community members while still preserving your general privacy. I do hope it will also encourage members to take a little bit of time to add information they would like to share about themselves in their "My information and settings" area fo the website. This will help you to connect better with others to collaborate and connect in the future.

I'm following this great dialogue on theatre and I'm so excited about the ideas, methods, and personal reflections that are being shared.

Nancy Pearson, New Tactics in Human Rights Program Manager

jtreibitz's picture

Puppetry: A Story from Bread and Puppet

I am still in the process of discovering how I can most effectively use puppetry to work within my community, and to support activists and organizations. So I thought I would share stories during this dialogue of how I’ve seen others use puppetry powerfully; the stories that have served as models for my own work. So I’ll start with:

BREAD AND PUPPET THEATER:

(www.breadandpuppet.org)

 

Bread and Puppet, based out of Glover, Vermont since the early 1970’s, is a radical puppet company that creates puppet parades, dances, circuses and outdoor pageants that explore social justice themes. I spend every summer with them and one of the most striking elements every year is participating in various Fourth of July parades. (The 4th of July is the USA’s Independence Day... a fiercely patriotic holiday with fireworks and parades based around general “our country is awesome” themes.)

 

Every year very conservative towns invite Bread and Puppet to parade with them despite their very radical messages. And every year Bread and Puppet participates with puppets (both fun and somber) that criticize the U.S. government and its policies. One year the end of our parade consisted of a line of Iraqi women (masked puppeteers) carrying dead naked bodies (puppet corpses) and a sign with the most recent number of dead U.S. soldiers and estimated dead Iraqis. That is not at all in the spirit of a typical 4th of July parade; instead of celebrating the heroics and might of the USA, Bread and Puppet questions and challenges it. But along with the somber puppets, there are stilters, a lively brass band, and always something to celebrate... like chickens with signs to represent local stores (we would change the names of the stores to fit each town) defeating a giant Walmart executive. Every year we’re the life of each parade and every following year we’re invited back.

 

The power of puppetry is that it can say whatever it wants to... an audience member can be charmed or wowed or laughed into listening to the most radical of values. And as a performer, I have found that it feels infinitely safer saying radical or personal things through a mask or a puppet. You’re not putting yourself in the line of fire because it’s the puppet who is saying or doing the stuff that feels risky.

 

In an earlier posting, Max talked about working with a Sudanese community who found it too painful to perform themes that hit close to home. I’m wondering if puppets might be an effective way to theatrically present painful stories or themes... if puppets might feel like a safer medium for exploring those topics. I don’t do that work so I have no experience in this area, but it does make me wonder.

max.vond's picture

the use of metaphor

Puppets, puppets, yes, they can be great.  I think some are so full of pathos and  emotion. They are really beautiful.  There's a magic to puppets, which is why kids like them so much.

Your comment, and those above about safety and being able to face issues, makes me think of the use of metaphor in theatre work.

In some kinds of drama therapy, participants create stories with props and material, and are never asked to connect these to their personal stories or lives.  The stories that emerge are often very rich and full of symbols.  They are metaphorical - they exist like a veil that covers another, perhaps more literal story.  This also happens in improvisation a lot - things emerge that are fairy-tale like, and full of splendor, and when you reflect back on it, there are all sorts of things you can 'read' into the work.  I think a well-used metaphor is the key to unlocking closed doors of dialogue.  Some therapists will believe that using a metaphor is enough, you don't even need to say what it is about, if you work with it.  Why does the prince lose his sight? Where can he regain it? What does he do to save himself? Where does he find this knowledge? Stories like this can be immensely satisfying, and it is right to think that they are useful in a human rights context.

I've seen good examples of this in work with homeless people in London - they come up with some pretty crazy stories! In one, an alien was visiting a foreign planet, and started to die in the dense atmosphere. It was found by one of the inhabitants of that planet, who saved it by letting it lick the salt from its sweat.  All of us in the room stood there dumbfounded, watching two homeless actors showing this scene about caring and healing and helping someone in need.  It was pretty cool. 

I participate in Playback Theatre, which is a movement related to Theatre of the Oppressed, in  which audience members tell stories that are re-enacted by a group of improvisers.  Very often, metaphor is used in the opposite way to what I've just described - a literal story is told, and then it is played or enacted in a metaphorical form.  This places the veil over the story, and I believe gives the teller distance from the experience, enough so that she or he can reflect and rehearse those famous futures that we talk about in Forum theatre.

Anyway, just to say, metaphors are useful, as are archetypes - thus, masks and puppets with their strong messages, and innocuous ways, which seem innocent enough to some, but which to others are deeply meaningful.

Anna Weekes's picture

And we all may have felt the

And we all may have felt the liberation that is provoked by controlling a puppet or becoming a mask, being able to express your self from the safety of a disguise. I find this also when a person is allowed to play a character of their choice, it is not them on stage telling their story, it is a character who's experiences are fed by those of the actor.... I love the freedom behind puppets, masks and characters, as a way for any one to be heard..

aabusrour's picture

puppets and Bread and Puppets

Being in Bread and Puppets was one of the amazing experiences that we have as Alrowwad Theatre troupe with the kids in 2005, during our theatre tour in the USA. We enjoyed 3 days of workshops and then participating in performing with them, besides performing our own play in their theatre.

These huge puppets, and their freedom of movement and expression, of criticizing, telling and commenting on events or subjects is great. It is beautiful and amazing to see, and to participate in. As Max says, no wonder children love them... but also adults I guess. They have this magic and power in them, There is no taboo. Nothing is censored or forbidden. Since old time, puppets where used to criticize the oppressor and make fun of this oppressor. It has been used in the Middle East mostly as a political tool of resistance and denunciation  of the occupier and social injustice, and land owners who exploit paysans. They have been used to commemorate historic events and characters and heroes.

Peter Schumman, the founder of Bread and Puppets came twice to Palestine and did wonderful work with us and other theatre groups in Palestine. The puppets created at the end of the workshops have toured in Bethlehem and Ramallah and made an amazing impact on people. It was the first time to see such huge puppets.

I don't know if they are safer than an actor performing the character. In the face of occupation I guess it doesn't matter whether you are acting or holding a puppet that acts... but, Puppets have their magic as Annie says.

AbdelFattah Abusrour, PhD Ashoka Fellow Director of Al-Rowwad Cultural and Theatre Training Center ____________________________________________ Alrowwad is an Independent Center for artistic, cultural, and theatre training for

kgowhari's picture

Re: [New Tactics Dialogues: Using Theatre for Human Rights Educa

Dear Friends

 

Please watch this short video about "theater of the oppressed project" we had in Iran. It was great and I really like to share it with you.

 

Best,

 

Kowsar Gowhari

http://vimeo.com/2037062


npearson's picture

Video showing use of Theater of the Oppressed techniques

Kowsar,

Thank you so much for sharing this video with us!

Nancy Pearson, New Tactics in Human Rights Program Manager

Selloane's picture

Relevance of stories - can small be smarter?

Can small can be smarter and understandable? – depends? Hi everyone. Thank you very much for these inspiring thoughts being shared here. This comment is inspired by Max's point. I am however, sharing a subjective concern I have from the Southern part of Africa… I just thought I could throw in something relating to definition of terms, and I wondered to what extend do they enable or hinder our work or practice. Well I am writing this because I realize the topic is on theatre, and yet some of the processes would require us to clarify what kind. So noting some of the discussions here, I have sort of come to like applied drama and theatre (Well I am a Drama For Life scholar and if you check www.dramaforlife.or.za you will understand my bias), anyway… In applied, I think there is a lot of collective risk taking in that both the actors and audience or ‘spect-actors’ to borrow from Boal would be challenged to reflect on their plight. I think this approach is particularly relevant for Southern Africa, where clarity on the different genre is either collapsed or implemented without full understanding of the principles. I have an experience in Lesotho where stories would be ‘packaged’ for everyone, and my contention is that this does not really work. I turn to think that there needs to be a shift from wanting to cover so many hundred and what what people, but in enabling moments for people to reflect on their own plight. At the core of what I would really like to say is that if we can clearly understand the different roles and processes, there would be less demands on certain processes whose demands and approaches are inappropriate, knowing whether we are engaging in a process or product. What do people think about ensuring understanding of the principles of our work, before borrowing, collapsing models, so that we can be judged on the merits of what we intended to do in the first place? Sometimes I look at a project review and I think, if the objectives were these, then this project has achieved the quality and not so much the quantity needed. I do realize that there is pressure for reach, reach, reach, but I think we need to take a step back and lay the tapestry of diverse approaches clearly for those that we would like to work with. Especially those who may support our initiatives. Due to HIV/Aids, the pressure may be too much, and thus undermine the power of theatre processes or products. Depending on clarity?

Motho ke motho ka batho

max.vond's picture

Hi Selloane,   I think

Hi Selloane,

I think you are calling for a more robust scholarship of applied theatre, is that correct? What I read is that you're interested in having approaches and tools be well organized and recorded.  That's a good idea, especially since, as you say, sometimes we're asked to perform quickly and make things happen that frankly, we aren't really suited to.  There need be no illusions about what the theatre can do - this is also the point that was made about theatre in conflict situations.

Even though things may become standardized, we're also still required to respond and adapt to each and every new situation. So we have to be careful not to become to standard in our approach, as this can be a shackle. 

I also agree that there's some question of what terms are appropriate - applied theatre is one of many options.  There's a problem, though, with any terminology or understanding of the theatre that points to something outside of theatre itself.  Discussion, conscientisation, transformation - these are all things inherent in what good theatre is.  When we say theatre for something - theatre for peace, development... etc, we are suddenly at the mercy of something, and become restricted.  If theatre is about creating a safe space, all these things, peace, development, human rights, clutter up the space before we're even in it!

Of course we engage with all these issues because we think theatre can make a contribution.  But its best to keep our perspective - maybe that's what you mean about ensuring understanding of the principles of our work.  Thanks for your thoughts!

Selloane's picture

I hear you completely

Yes Max, and I think this can go a long way in substantiating our work win quality. Perhaps the notion that less is more, and also looking at the recent slogan of the AIDS mexico conference - go deeper, go longer. Time is so critical, time to reflect, engage, reflect engage, action, discuss etc.

Thank you for your engagement.

Motho ke motho ka batho

Annie Sloman's picture

Watching some contemporary wayang kulit(shadow puppetry)

Hi all,

I'm currently in the midst of a great community arts festival in Salatiga Indonesia - Festival Mata Air , http://web.mac.com/komunitastuk/TUK_Site/Home.html a festival that is using the arts to promote environmental awareness and change particularly in regards to water issues (and is the reason i haven't been able to get on this site so much this week, as i'm sure you can all understand!).  And i thought i would share with you all what last nights performance was, as it brought back to me exactly the power that performance/puppetry can do.

Last night, in the middle of rice fields, in a small urban kampung (neighbourhood) in the middle of salatiga, was a performance from Wayang Kampung Sebelah from Solo, central Java a fantastic contemporary  wayang kulit, shadow puppet group that mixes traditional wayang kulit with contemporary issues, characters, as well as dandut, a contemporary Indonesia popular pop music, that is a lot of fun.  The show was about a community were a corporation wants to privatize their natural spring, (a very common issue in this area), which in the end the community fights and decides not to allow.

So pretty typical story but the way that it was put across had people in stitches, a clever mix of wit, wicked music and hilarious puppet characters enable the story that was extremely close to the bone, and would in a normal situation be quite controversial, be very digestible!  But what was really amazing was the audience.  The show was long (luckily only 3 hours as opposed to the formal wayang kulit tradition of 12hours!) starting quite late, but the audience stayed right till the end, and this was not just your normal one 'type' of audience but was a mixture of the political leaders of the district, members of the community old and young, street punks that had come from all over the region for the next days punk concert as well as quite a lot of internationals.  And during this time we had the juxtaposition of the extremely elite political leaders in their VIP seats laughing whole heartily to the humor and wit (which was simultaneously, in many ways  making fun of and undermining their own roles in society) while the punk contingent were dancing crazily to the same storey and music and the community was watching with total enthusiasm, all enjoying each others company, identifying with the storey, enjoying the entertainment while also sensing the edge that the storey has.  Many people commented later on just how impressed they were with how such an entertaining show was able to get to the core of such a political issue, in a way that human performance could not have done.

So yes, last night was a lot of fun!

kayhanirani's picture

Wayang Kulit

Thanks Annie. What a wonderful example of people using their traditional artistic practices and blending them with contemporary forms and well as social commentary!

 It makes me think of an idea I had to blend Wayang Kulit with Theater of the Oppressed Techniques.  I was in an international Asian performing arts fellowship where one of the artists was a Wayang puppeteer.  We got to talking about creating a Wayang Kulit piece that would basically be like a forum theater show.  Where the puppeteers would show a scene/play about a local issue/oppression and after, the audience would discuss and those who wanted to could call out interventions that they would want the puppets to make ... then, they get to sit behind the screen or right near the screen and tell the puppeteers what to do as they were re-playing the show.  

We never got to do it, but hearing your story makes me think about that blend! I hope you are having a wonderful time.

max.vond's picture

working with Schizophrenia

I want to share a story of a small project that came to me recently.

I was visiting a centre for mental health patients in London, in connection  to some of my work with homeless people, and had the opportunity to meet a woman living there who is a voice hearer, diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia.  She showed me some  writing that she'd been doing, and asked if I could help her  do something with it.

The writing was literally a record of what the  voices in her head were saying over a certain  period.  She did not act like an author, but rather as someone who'd just written down what she had heard.  The text was  chaotic and scary.  It was like white noise on the television, with every now and then a concrete image jumping out.  Much of it was about the Royal Family and Princess Diana, with whom the author feels a particular connection.

The first 'book' I was shown was roughly the length of eight monologues.  A week ago Sunday, we performed a rehearsed reading of this book, with six actors, at a venue in London called The  Foundry, with an invited audience.  The writer was there, and after the performance, she had a discussion with the  audience about her experiences with mental health and  breakdown, and where her writing came from.

I'm happy to say that people were really happy to have been present for this - it was a really good example of positive witnessing.  I'm also happy to say that the writer's confidence and health has soared since we started working with her, and in the last six months I've witnessed a real change in her confidence and ease.

Just telling your story, that's all it takes sometimes. 

jtreibitz's picture

Our Own Voice Theater Troupe: theater and mental health

I worked for a little while in Memphis, Tennessee with a wonderful theater group called Our Own Voice Theater Troupe. They dealt with issues relating to mental health and created their own shows. Their actors and playwrights were a combination of people with mental illnesses and people without. One of their most prolific playwrights is a severely schizophrenic  man who writes pretty wild but brilliant plays. Working with his words and creating visual narratives through them resulted in some of the most cutting edge theater I've ever seen. The process was very empowering  for all of us and not making any distinctions between those of us with mental illness and those without was a very powerful element of the troupe and made everyone feel equally valuable and made us all feel ownership of the work.

The troupe used their plays to raise issues around societal views of mental illness, around mainstream definitions of "reality" and the exclusion of those whose realities differ, around the dangers of corporate drug companies and television therapy shows, and around the pitfalls, benefits, effects, hard choices and pressures inherent in using prescribed drugs for mental illness.

The issues they deal with go far beyond personal healing and therapy and really critique the effect of capitalism on mental health, question whether people with mental illness are, in fact, "ill", and challenge audiences to look closely at the cultural mainstreams they live in and see how it affects their own mental health and their views of what is "health" and who are actually "healthy".

Their work is visionary and I wish more people knew of them. Their website is: www.ourownvoice.org

 

Xris Reardon's picture

offers

I am currently facilitating a process with people living with mental health issues and/or carers, - this was a brilliant offer, timely. Appreciated.

jtreibitz's picture

one last note

Bill, the artistic director of the troupe, was both a theater practitioner  and a therapist.  He used to do theater/therapy workshops at clinics and would insist that if he was doing a workshop with mental health consumers, that the clinicians/staff would have to participate, as well. He wouldn't allow any hierarchical separation between the two groups and talked about how he found what a profound difference that made for the experience of both parties. Most notably, it allowed staff to hear the issues of consumers on a peer level and allowed them to share themselves as well. It brought the whole group together and helped each group understand the other in a more holistic way.

I hope that is an accurate representation of what I remember Bill telling me!

npearson's picture

Bridging the gap between mainstream and the margins

Max,

This is an incredibly powerful story illustrating how theater can be such a transformational tool for helping groups to better understand how those in the "mainstream" of societies keep others in the "margins" - whether out of fear, discrimination or misunderstanding. It is always interesting to note and be aware that the "mainstream" and the "margins" are constantly fluid. Theater provides a very unique tool for utilizing  those shifts in creative ways to open new possibilities. Thank you for sharing it and the stories of the others that followed.

Nancy Pearson, New Tactics in Human Rights Program Manager

Selloane's picture

Never-to-forget theatre experience

Such an inspiration I have gained form various experiences. Thanks. Would also like to share about...

Linking Lesotho (in Southern Africa, completely surrounded by South Africa - but independent state) through theatre...

 

I am also associated with the Winter/Summer Institute in Theatre for Development. Ok briefly - in 2006, the National University of Lesotho (NUL)’s Faculty of Humanities hosted the first biennial, multi-national collaborative initiative, the Winter/Summer Institute (WSI) in Theatre for Development[1] - www.maketheatre.org. WSI’s primary collaborative creative work takes place in an intensive three week residency in June/July.  The project grew out of discussions between theatre practitioners and academics from the participating institutions, along with community development activists.  All initiators shared a commitment to collaborative, improvisational-driven work, with a focus on enhancing the theatre making capacity of students and staff while engaging in innovative ways of addressing issues of HIV/Aids through drama and theatre.  For the participating institutions, it is winter in the South and summer in the North; hence the name.  

In June/July this year a new play; Its Just You And Me, My Wife and Your Boyfriend/Ke ’Na le Uena, Mosali oa ka Le Mohlankana oa Hau Feela, was developed and performed at Roma, Maseru and Malealea Lesotho.. The play explored tensions associated with choices, chances and changes amidst power, denial, stigma and HIV/Aids. Having established a unique blend of theatre elements and tapping of participant’s talents and creativity, the WSI in Theatre for Development was able to allow audience to thread the story beyond the performance, thus shift the sometimes ephemeral theatre experience to challenge them to think beyond their own frame of what is and what could be. Exceptional about the play was its ability to present children’s milieu amidst the pandemic and an endeavor to explain the rapid spread of HIV in Southern Africa.

Sharp, succinct and sometimes poignant scenes evolved from the village that served as a backdrop to a theatre genre that transcends the divide likely to be created by conventional theatre forms. Actors took on multiple roles to capture a story of once a good quality of life but now distorted due to HIV/Aids. A story informed by recent research such as Helen Epstein’s concurrency theory and presentations by local practitioners such as Dr. Molotsi Monyamane and international partners such as Mèdicins San Frontières (MSF) as well as personal testimonies of living with Aids. A story comforting and discomforting, entwined by music richly endowed with the WSI’s cultural diversity under the directorship of Alta Van As of the university of Witwatersrand, South Africa

It is still astonishing however, how HIV/Aids still brings to the surface the misconception, taboos and dichotomy of ideologies despite massive campaigns of education that Lesotho and other countries has embarked on. In the play, the uncle scene was particularly found disturbing as the vulnerability of orphaned children was laid bare. “The laughter is of nervousness, we have girl children and the scene where the uncle rapes the child is just too close to reality”. Said one audience member during post performance facilitation. This for me is one never-to-forget experience about the power of theatre as a tool for social change.

  

 


[1] Participating universities were NUL, the University of Witwatersrand/School of Education (Republic of South Africa), the University of Sunderland (United Kingdom) and Empire State College, State University of New York (SUNY) [United States of America]. Due to practical restructuring issues in its theatre department, the University of Sunderland did not participate in 2008.  

 

Motho ke motho ka batho

max.vond's picture

when does the change happen?

Wow,

this show sounds really amazing and like it touched people deeply.  I'm responding right now to a point you made, of how there have been massive campaigns to inform people of the dangers of HIV, but still the behaviors  of most people hasn't changed.  I am familiar with drama for life, and I know this is one of the big questions in your programme - how to really make change.   

I love the enlightened comments in this dialogue, many of which have to do with awareness and granting permission for anything to happen.  I wonder if you can talk about this from a drama for life perspective, and how you scholars are looking towards the future in your work in Southern Africa.

thanks! 

Selloane's picture

Just thought I would share

Just thought I would share this change cycle with everyone. I always find it useful in terms of appreciating what might be taking place as we do our work. Ourselves and those that we work with and for. If I knew how to make a link I would just do that so that everyone can visit the site and see the picture of the different stages.

The Change Cycle™ Model

Change has always been a necessary aspect of life and work, and our world is changing more rapidly than ever. It is likely that you will have to cope with a variety of changes in the near future. Your success and fulfillment - your emotional, mental, spiritual and physical well-being - depend on how well you adapt to change.

People react, respond and adjust to change in a sequence of six predictable stages. The Change Cycle model identifies the thoughts, feelings and behaviors associated with each stage of change. There is no better map to assist you in navigating through the changes in your life.

Copyright CCMC, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Stage 1 – Loss to Safety In Stage 1 you admit to yourself that regardless of whether or not you perceive the change to be good or 'bad" there will be a sense of loss of what "was."

Stage 2 – Doubt to Reality In this stage, you doubt the facts, doubt your doubts and struggle to find information about the change that you believe is valid. Resentment, skepticism and blame cloud your thinking.

Stage 3 – Discomfort to Motivation You will recognize Stage 3 by the discomfort it brings. The change and all it means has now become clear and starts to settle in. Frustration and lethargy rule until possibility takes over.

The Danger Zone The Danger Zone represents the pivotal place where you make the choice either to move on to Stage 4 and discover the possibilities the change has presented or to choose fear and return to Stage 1.

Stage 4 – Discovery to Perspective Stage 4 represents the "light at the end of the tunnel." Perspective, anticipation, and a willingness to make decisions give a new sense of control and hope. You are optimistic about a good outcome because you have choices.

Stage 5 - Understanding In Stage 5, you understand the change and are more confident, think pragmatically, and your behavior is much more productive. Good thing.

Stage 6 - Integration By this time, you have regained your ability and willingness to be flexible. You have insight into the ramifications, consequences and rewards of the change -- past, present, and future.  

 

Copyright © 2008 CCMC, Inc. All Rights Reserved Website Design and Hosting Provided by Lance D. Jenkinson & IT Consultants

 

 

Motho ke motho ka batho

prugell's picture

Theatre for social change with activists

Hello all

I’m really enjoying the discussions that are unfolding. Thank you to everyone that’s contributing and to NT for all the work you do to create a space for such dialogues.

Along the theme of how theatre can be used as a powerful tool in human rights work one area (of many!) that I am interested in exploring and developing is facilitating workshops using Theatre of the Oppressed (TO) processes with people actively engaged in social change work. I’m wondering if people are more likely to stay engaged to social change work if they have an opportunity to reflect on the work they do, be heard, dialogue, learn with others who share their desire for social change in a creative environment.

Primarily I envisage it would create a space for people to debrief and reflect on the , social change work (ie campaigns) that they are engaged in, and to explore what they feel maximizes and minimizes their desire for work for and create social change. A space possibly to question and dream wildly about how their work in the world might look. In doing so the participants could be sharing their experiences and learnings to support each other and ‘rehearse’ how their future work could be. This may be a way to peer-educate and keep people motivated to continue with their action (social change work).

Do people know of any people that are using Theatre of the Oppressed processes to work with such communities to support their social change work?

If so it would be great to hear about them and/or any stories that people have.

Warmly. Pru

www.thechangeagency.org

Xris Reardon's picture

Stories

Heh Pru.. NOT sure where your based, but assume part time in NT. There is a list of National TO and TFL practitioners here in Australia, that I have collected through training's I have run or hosted. Am happy to pass on to you. some names etc; of those who have come to the work with strong activist leanings, as perhaps opposed to those who entered the work through a stronger interest in drama - though a fine line with TO.

Yes, as a person who came to TO/TFl through activism. I know the value in finding was to talk about "the work", differently, in fact I got into TO because I found some of the ways we were organizing here in Victoria as activists, for me were not embodied enough, if that makes sense - or perhaps I should say they did not seem to be inclusive enough, address privileges, move beyond the didactic culture of "warfare" . Anyway let me know if you want me to pass on your details to TO /TFL practitioners here. There are some strong indij leaders in the TO feild, also, some TO practitioners working in that area..you maybe, interested in linking and having these conversations  with them?

Re tools: an offer - there is also a great tactic we used in Melbourne amongst  a groups of activist called: Wildest Dreams. I learnt this tool some years ago, was keen on it's use.  Then worked on getting a workshop together here. it looked at inclusion it was for social justice activists etc;  where we are, our dreams..the steps in between. If you want I am happy to talk more re this tool. just email..

max.vond's picture

working with activists

I just wanted to respond about the idea of doing theatre work with activists.  Of course, why not?  I think a TO process will work in these cases and can be very useful.  I am starting to get work as a facilitator from  organizations interested in looking at their internal workings, and TO tools come in very handily.

I would also recommend that you experience Playback theatre, if you haven't already.  There are good Playback companies in Sydney and I think Melbourne as well.  Playback is a great debriefing tool, as it involves audience members telling their stories and these being re-enacted by actors.

Xris, your point about moving into TO because your work as an activist didn't feel 'embodied' enough seems really interesting to me (I hope I understood correctly).  I mentioned a TO practitioner somewhere else in this dialogue, named Sanjoy Ganguli, who told me a similar story. He was a Communist activist who found problems with the party and its way of advocating, and so moved into pure grass-roots forum theatre work.  I think this speaks to a different kind of activism, really, than what is commonly envisaged.  Theatrical processes are inherently democratic, at least, TO is, as are some other forms.  I think this safeguards against power structures and egos that can become established in activist movements.   

npearson's picture

Theater process tools

Xris, Pru and Max,

I'm really interested in the ideas and processes that you've raised here for assisting activists in exploring, debriefing, sharing, celebrating, and generally processing "the work". 

Is it possible for you to share the "Wildest Dreams" tool? I am really interested to learn more about it.

By the way - Xris and Pru, I hope you connect as you are both in Australia. It's a big country but perhaps you're not too far apart! 

Nancy Pearson, New Tactics in Human Rights Program Manager

Xris Reardon's picture

Tools

Thanks Nancy and to all at NTP, for getting this dialogue up and running. It was an invaluable opportunity to talk to, share and reflect on a vast wealth of expertise's. Will def share wildest dream, and also the future we are afraid off. One is a Boal tool the other I think??? devised by Headlines, and adapted. Not sure when the dialogue finishes - know I can spend time writing the steps over my weekend. Is this ok???  If the dialogue is closed maybe I can email them to you can you could decide if to post them??? And I am sure Pru and I will manage to connect. The change agency has been receiving training updates, and I never knew much about them so great to have this opp to connect with PRU through the project...

npearson's picture

Adding information after the dialogue "closing date"

Xris,

Yes, please add the information to the dialogue - thank you so much for your willingness to spend time to write up the steps for "Wildest Dream" and "The Future we are afraid of" tools. These sound really great! 

A Point of Clarification on the Dialogues:

Although each featured dialogue has a specific opening and closing date, the dialogues are always open for community members to add a comment, resource, etc., even after the "official" closing date.  We maintain a set time period for those of you who have generously offered your time to be "featured resource practitioners." New Tactics wants to honor your commitment and setting aside the time to be available for the dialogue. 

You can continue to use this dialogue space to maintain communication for sharing updates on resources and ideas. You can easily do this by clicking on "Participate by e-mail" and you will be send any new comments added to the dialogue.

You can also form your own "group" as Kristin outlined in her comment "Online Dialogues" .

Nancy Pearson, New Tactics in Human Rights Program Manager

kayhanirani's picture

Working with Activists

Hi Everyone -

Pru, I'm glad that you brought this up.  For the last 3 years, I and the Theater of the Oppressed Lab at the Brecht Forum in NYC have been trying to work with activists and community groups to teach them the techniques and how to use them in their situations.  

To be honest, the work has been extremely hard and slow going.  First, the practical considerations - time and money.  To ask people who are amazingly busy with community organizing to take time away from that work to immerse themselves in some theater (even if it is for a weekend a month or so) is hard.  People want to relax, or do what they think is "the work".  Many people have a hard time committing to theater and making room for it in their work in a substantial way because they find it intimidating, strange or even useless. 

What we have seen is that individual members, or maybe a pair of members may take a public workshop with us and use what they can in a small way, or not at all.  When we have gone to places and tried to create more formal, long lasting relationships it is difficult.  You really need a combination of factors - a few people who really believe in, and want to use theater. A person or people in a more higher level in the organization also behind the theater project agreeing to put the org's time resources behind it.  And finally, community members who are receptive.  After all, if theater fails to capture the interest of the population that activist groups are working with, then they are less likely to spend their time and energy to develop a program.

I would love to hear how your work has been going Pru.

Love K

jtreibitz's picture

Using Culture

I know we’re supposed to be talking about our own theater experiences, but I feel that most of my work is building directly off of the work of others and I just don’t find my own stuff nearly as interesting just yet as the work of those I’m learning from. So here I’d like to highlight a couple of powerful examples of theater that use cultural traditions as their foundation. Drawing from their own cultural roots was effective and profound and I frequently look to these two examples as models:

Domestic Workers Purimspiel

A Purimspiel happens on the Jewish holiday of Purim. It is the annual retelling of the story of Esther, the Jewish wife of a king who intervened in state business to foil a plot to kill the Jews in her kingdom.  An awesome organization, Jews for Racial and Economic Justice (JFREJ), organizes progressive Jews around local social justice issues in New York City. When they were working with Domestic Workers United to support their campaign to pass a Bill of Rights that would protect domestic workers, they used the holiday Purim and the traditional Purimspiel to raise awareness of the issue. They worked together with Domestic Workers United to create an alternative Purimspiel that told the story of Purim from the point of view of the workers in the castle. The play had music, puppets, crazy costumes, and was created and performed by a coalition of JFREJ members and domestic workers. It was a huge success, was performed many times and was even toured to other cities.

WombWorks/Nu World Theater www.wombwork.com

Womb Works is amazing. I saw them perform in Baltimore (where they are based) and they completely changed my view about my role in activism. They aim to “preserve and re-empower families and communities through the creative arts, music, dance, and theater expressions.” Their show had at least 50 African American youth of all ages saying, through poetry and dance and chorus work, the fiercest, most deeply true, most honest and direct things addressing racism and unbalance in their lives and connecting it to institutional racism and the Iraq war and other larger policy-level issues. Moving from a more contemporary style of performance, they ended the show with totally energetic and intense African dancing.

They describe their work: “Our production helps the participants release from the stress of an unbalanced society and creates for the audience a mirror in which to view themselves, past present and future, to analyze their conditions and make better choices that will enable them to rise to their highest potential.... WombWorks brings art and spirit  together to create long lasting healing of the cellular memory, our earliest DNA, the truth we know in our inner core but believe we don’t remember. Once that memory is triggered, the healing process begins. In traditional society, art forms such as dance, music and theater were used as medicine to heal the community. WombWorks restores the ancient tradition of the healing power of these art forms in order to maintain the spiritual connection of all people.”

They are not joking around. That performance was among the top three most powerful theater experiences I've ever had in my life.

irfan's picture

Aristotle, Plato , Socrates

irfan

Hi to All,

I work in Human Rights Commission for Social Justice and Peace Quetta Balochistan. As it is obvious from the name of the organization, Human Rights, Social Justice and Peace" which are the fundamental issues of human being fright from the start of the human history up till now, many great social reformers  like Aristotle, Plato  , Socrates and many more struggled to set human beings free from the bondage of exploitation caused by social injustice , unfair distribution of resources and destroying peace in the world just for commercial reasons. I try to make familiar the community, students , teachers and youths about the issues of human rights , social , justice and peace through open street shows , open painting exhibition shows to make them realize and feel what they think and perceive about  the issues. As I am living in the most difficult and different part of Pakistan, whereas going with the theater and painting and music are alien for people, as compared to the other provinces of Pakistan are comparatively more familiar with   theater and painting and music. The reasons for being alien with open theater and painting, since Balochistan is very backward, tribal and fundamentally it has strong religious build. All these three points stopped people to understand and feel the issues of human rights, justice, peace and democracy. I through theater and painting shows try to awaken the critical sense of the people to feel the bondages created by backwardness, tribal and wrong religious ideas and practices , unfortunately since the wave of the suicide bombing attacks we are no more able to go with the open street and painting shows, where were really the source of awakening people.   

New Tactics's picture

---SHARE THEATRE EXERCISES AND TOOLS THAT HAVE BEEN USEFUL

Main Theme 2:

  • Share theatre exercises and tools that have been useful for groups and communities looking to solve their problems.

Share practical information on how you implemented your theatre activity. Explain the steps you took to those of us that have never used this tactic. Share resources and tools that others can access to help them to use theatre in their work.

To add a new exercise, resource, or tool, please 'reply' to this comment.

kayhanirani's picture

Theater of the Oppressed - Complete the Image

Hi Everyone -

I am so glad to be able to start this dialogue off.  What I'll do is give step by step instructions for a foundational exercise of the Theater of the Oppressed called "Complete the Image".  I will then give my thoughts on why this is an important exercise to do with groups in preparing them to think about their futures and what they want to create for themselves and their communities.

COMPLETE THE IMAGE

 Procedure:

Two volunteers come to the front of the classroom.  They face each other and shake hands and freeze.  While they are frozen they must stay in the same position as long as they can.

 

Facilitator draws an imaginary frame around the image they have created and asks the spectators to imagine what this image can be of.  For instance, they are meeting for the first time and one is a boss interviewing a job candidate, etc.  Be sure to get the participants to talk about how the characters are standing and how that effects what they see in the image.  EX: They look like they know each other because they are standing very close and smiling, etc. Move from the "objective" to the "subjective".

 

Then, one of the pair steps out of the image and the other is alone holding the same pose as before.  Spectators then analyze this image in the same way as above. 

 

Then, the partner who stepped out can come back into the image and “complete the image” in any way s/he wishes.  S.he can arrange her body in front, behind, below, etc. of their partner, but she can’t change her partner’s image in any way.  But she must step out of the image completely, look at the frozen image that remains and then come back in.

 

This new image is analyzed again by those watching.

 

Then the second partner (who remained frozen) can come out and “complete the image” in the same way that the first did.  This new image is analyzed by the spectators. Then, ask the first participant to step out again, but this time a spectator from the audience comes in to replace her and s/he can “complete the image” in her own way. Have a few spectators try this out. See what the group imagines.  Are they constrained in their imagination, are they saying the same themes over and over, what is the group "seeing" in the images?

 

After many repetitions, add a "theme" on to the image.  Ask people to make images of "resistance".  Have many people try different interventions, and discuss the types of resistance images that are being shown.  Are they all violent, does the group have a hard time showing resistance, etc. 

 

Discuss what they thought about the exercise in a large group discussion. Discuss the images of resistance and what the group thought about the process and the results.

 

MY THOUGHTS: 

In stories and attempts at resistance, we can see the embodiment of narrative, history, and hope.  Participants begin a synthesis of their lived experience, historical images of resistance, and what they want and can do in the future.  Augusto Boal’s Theater of the Oppressed, provides a great pedagogical foundation for us to see how theater bring participants from anti-oppression discourse to practice.    

Many people think of art as a reflection of reality, that the artist replicates an aspect of what already is, what exists, with a fresh twist, a strange perspective, or some extra sensory perception.  However, this is a narrow view of the work of the artist and the power of the arts.  Augusto Boal has said that art is a mirror which reflects reality, but it is a magic mirror. One we can reach into to transform the image into what we want it to be.  This idea underlies all of the Theater of the Oppressed work; that the artist works from the real, transforming it.  And, that anyone can be an artist – it just takes a vision of the possible, of what can be.  This concept of his is grounded by Boal’s work with Paulo Freire and his inclusion of Paulo Freire’s pedagogy; to see, to analyze, and to act.  This is most clear in Boal’s exercise, “Complete the Image”.  Here the exercise moves students through an analytic process where they must contend with the image they see, the “real” image, and with change.  They must change themselves, change their position or action in order to make new meaning out of the image. I value this exercise as a way to bring participants into their own process of problem solving and liberation because it is the job of the facilitator to hand over the "wheel" to the participants.  This exercise primes the participants to take over. 

 

Using complete the image with the theme of resistance helps participants to envision the multiple possibilities of what resistance can look like; stimulating their senses and rehearsing for the future.  There is no right or wrong, there is the process of analyzing and creating, and re-creating.  What we see in this exercise is what we see in life: images of solidarity, violence, mutual support, or nonviolent actions.  But while we are asking participants to “complete the image”, they are never making a complete image.  They are always struggling with change, with perception.  They practice being inside the image, being analyzed by others, and outside them image, analyzing it.  They are embodying being a subject of their own life, and the oppression of how the dominant society sees them.  In order to gain a sense of comfort with this complex relationship between oneself and society – one needs practice.  Instead of throwing participants into creating action plans or concrete resolutions, we are having them explore their relationship to the larger community of resisters by embodying the act over and over again through many exercises and examples.

Resistance is imagination, creativity, creation, regeneration, and love.  Using theater to understand and explore resistance is a more powerful force for transformation because of the regenerative properties, the subjunctive action, imagination, the visioning process for creating the future. Through this process, we are looking at today’s struggle, but are not bogged down – rather we create links for continuing to move out of that struggle.  The coupling of the analytical and transformative aspects of art making is an important way to move from resistance to future action. This is the power of the work, and it is how participants can see themselves as resisters in charge of the shape of their future.

 

max.vond's picture

a bit more on images

The description of image work above is really good and clear, I hope it is useful to people who are newcomers to the concept and idea of making images.

A wonderful thing about these exercises is that they can be adapted to suit your needs and desires. I here offer a development that involves moving images.

If two actors (spectators? participants? humans?) are making an image together, it is possible to dynamise them by allowing them to move into a sequence of images.  

Here's how it goes:

One actor takes a position, and then another takes a position that is relative to, or in dialogue with, the original actor's position.   They hold this  image for a moment.

Then, the first actor takes a new position, in dialogue with or relative  to, the last position taken by her partner.  Then the partner takes a new position. They go on like this, taking turns to assume a position in relation to the partner. 

What occurs is a fluid sequence of images, where the actors are responding to each others' positions and making a series of images. 

The benefits of this exercise:  lots of fun, finding a mode of dialogue with your partner, becoming more physically engaged with the work, feeling creative.

You can also have three people doing this, which is also great fun.

I would encourage actors to stay close to each other, engaging with  each other's spaces insofar as this is comfortable.  

If you like, you can give a theme or a principle that they can work with.  This changes the tone a lot.  Give them a word... say, 'danger', and watch the  sequence of images that comes out.  Give them something more complicated, a phrase like 'I wasn't there', and then see.  If the group already trusts itself/each other well enough, put in themes that are personal to those present.  Importantly, I think the actors shouldn't worry about  how well they reflect the theme or  principle that is given.  Tell them to  just hold it in their minds and then perform the exercise as it is described - if you are thinking of the  principle, the correct images will  emerge.

It usually feels good to discuss the exercises afterwards - what story came out?  Discuss the dynamics of the exercise, the  challenges it poses, the realities it unhinges (physical restrictions, communicative  barriers...).

 

 

 

boeh0093's picture

The Death of Augusto Boal

We here at New Tactics were saddened to hear that Brazilian playright Augusto Boal passed away on Saturday at the age of 78.

Augusto Boal was known for his work as the founder of the "Theater of the Oppressed", and has influenced many involved in the arts and in human rights work.  Even within this dialogue, practitioners have mentioned the influence of his work. 

Boal studied theatre arts at Columbia University in New York City, and created the Theater of the Oppressed in the 1960's as a way to establish a dialogue between the audience, the playwright, the actors, and the directors as a way to encourage political activism.  In Boal's view, oppression is when one person is dominated by the dialogue of another, and has no chance to reply. (Harvard University Gazette) Through the Theater of the Oppressed, Boal was able to create a space for dialogue and activism in theater.

Because of his work in the Theatre of the Oppressed, Boal was seen as a threat by the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from 1964-1985, and was jailed and tortured before being exiled to Argentina.  He returned to Brazil following the fall of the military dictatorship, and continued to work in the Theater of the Oppressed for years to come.

He has been an inspiration for many, and gave voices to people who lived in poor communities so that they could express, through drama, the problems that affected their everyday lives. Boal will leave a lasting impact on the use of theatre for political action.

boeh0093's picture

The Death of Augusto Boal

We here at New Tactics were saddened to hear that Brazilian playright Augusto Boal passed away on Saturday at the age of 78.

Augusto Boal was known for his work as the founder of the "Theater of the Oppressed", and has influenced many involved in the arts and in human rights work.  Even within this dialogue, practitioners have mentioned the influence of his work. 

Boal studied theatre arts at Columbia University in New York City, and created the Theater of the Oppressed in the 1960's as a way to establish a dialogue between the audience, the playwright, the actors, and the directors as a way to encourage political activism.  In Boal's view, oppression is when one person is dominated by the dialogue of another, and has no chance to reply. (Harvard University Gazette) Through the Theater of the Oppressed, Boal was able to create a space for dialogue and activism in theater.

Because of his work in the Theatre of the Oppressed, Boal was seen as a threat by the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from 1964-1985, and was jailed and tortured before being exiled to Argentina.  He returned to Brazil following the fall of the military dictatorship, and continued to work in the Theater of the Oppressed for years to come..

He has been an inspiration for many, and gave voices to people who lived in poor communities so that they could express, through drama, the problems that affected their everyday lives. 

jtreibitz's picture

Organizing a Neighborhood-Based Puppet Parade

An effective model that I am pursuing for neighborhood-based community puppet parades has been created (and is still being developed) by Spiral Q Puppet Theater in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Spiral Q’s neighborhood parades and pageants are a collaboration of community members, local organizations and municipal leaders. It's an effective process because it's designed and driven by community members, it raises up local issues/visions, it can bring together people across race/class lines, and involves different sectors of a neighborhood and encourages neighborhood unity.

 

I’m going to share the general process to create such a parade, but for more details on how Spiral Q does it, visit their website or contact them: www.spiralq.org

 

(This process could take weeks... this is just a general outline:)

 

1. A strong neighborhood parade begins with strong neighborhood participation and ties. Collaborate with a local group or community-based organization that is committed to the success of the parade.

 

2. Through collective brainstorming exercises/games, draw out the themes, visions and or concerns about the neighborhood from participants and collectively choose which people would like to raise up in their parade.

 

3. Through more brainstorming exercises, draw out visuals around the chosen themes and collectively choose what visuals people would like to make.

 

4. Work with participants to design each puppet (you could break into groups, each group taking on one puppet if that makes sense in context): how should it move? how big should it be? how should it be operated and how many people should that take? (Numbers 4 - 9 here aren’t necessarily in order and will probably need to be somewhat simultaneous).

 

5. Collectively decide on and implement the parade logistics, making sure participants take leadership and responsibility for achieving the different elements: where should it start and end, what permits will you need, how many parade volunteers will you need, who else do you want to include in the parade*, where do you want to advertise, etc...

*As part of a neighborhood parade, it’s important to include other community organizations, businesses, schools, drill teams, choirs... contact them and see how they’d like to support or participate in the event whether it’s by helping build the puppets, by marching in the parade in their own specific way, or by donating money.

 

6. Build the puppets with participants!

 

7. As part of the parade-planning process, you could plan neighborhood events with the different organizations, businesses, and community members involved as a way for them to socialize with each other/see what each other does in the neighborhood/generate excitement over the upcoming parade

 

8. Advertise, advertise, advertise!

 

9. With participants, make sure logistics are in order, make sure each participating group has what it needs for the parade, make sure you have enough volunteers (and prep time) for the puppets, etc...

 

10. Parade!

 

11. Celebrate the success of the parade with a party or something and make sure you get an evaluation of the process from participants so you can reflect on how the process was experienced by them.

kantin's picture

Re: Organizing a Neighborhood-Based Puppet Parade

Thanks for describing this general process for 'organizing a neighborhood-based puppet parade', Janelle! It sounds like a wonderful community-building exercise (and fun!).

I wonder if you could expand on #3

Through more brainstorming exercises, draw out visuals around the chosen themes and collectively choose what visuals people would like to make.

What kinds of exercises for brainstorming these themes have you used? From other comments in this dialogue, it seems like this brainstorming process and having the group is a very important part of this process. Is this the time that they decide the issue that they want to focus on? I can imagine this would take quite a bit of time. What has been your experience?

Also, I really like #11 - Celebrate success! This is so important and often overlooked by human rights practitioners. I'm so glad that you included this as a step in the process. 

Kristin Antin, New Tactics Online Community Builder

jtreibitz's picture

Exercises to draw out images on a theme

Normal 0

false false false

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

/* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

Here are three exercises I have used to elicit images on a theme:

 

1) Mind’s Eye: Instruct the group to close it’s eyes. Tell them “I’m going to say a word or a phrase and I want to know: what is the first thing that pops into your head? What do you see?” I usually start with abstract words that they can easily identify with like “happy” or “beautiful” before I introduce more complicated concepts. Then you can give them words/phrases that were general themes they identified that they want to include in the parade or give them words that the participants used in the discussion around the themes... for example: “safe housing” or “less crime” or “community” or “police brutality” or “city council”). If they seem to be having trouble making clear images, you can give them the word/phrase and then ask them to focus in on the image and if it’s a moving image to freeze it and look at it clearly. Ask follow-up questions to help them: What colors do you see? Is your image big or small? Does it have texture? Are there people in it? What are their expressions? Etc.

Record the images people describe on something they can all see (like on butcher paper).

 

2) Individual Drawing:  I approach this two different ways. I’ll either ask a question and ask them to draw their answer (“What do safe streets look like?” or “Why are safe streets important?” or “What do safe streets mean to you?”)...

Or I’ll offer a theme/phrase and ask them to draw it. (“Choose a few markers and draw ‘Safe Streets’.)

When they’ve drawn their images, have them hang them up in one area, gather around them and ask them: “What do you see?”

Record their responses on something they can all see.

 

3) Group mural: I use the same process for Individual Drawing, but I ask the group to draw a mural together in answer to the question or in response to the theme instead of individually.

 

After you’ve gathered responses, go over them with the group and notice if there are any strong images that came out of the exercise, or images they particularly respond to. Pointing out that they will be parading and that people who were not in the theme discussion will be watching, ask them which images might be good representations of the themes. After some discussion, take a vote or get consensus on which images they might like to turn into puppets.

 

(If there aren’t strong images that come out of this that might be good for puppets, you can more directly lead a follow-up discussion of “What other images do you think would represent this theme?”)

jtreibitz's picture

My Favorite Resources!

Below are my favorite and most-used resources. I begin with books and end with websites. They run the gamut from puppetry to theater in development to direct action. But they have all been incredibly helpful in my theater work, whether for tools they offer or for models to follow. Enjoy!:

 

“Wise Fool Basics: A handbook of our core techniques” by K. Ruby

This is a GREAT resource for making puppets, masks, stilts and other visuals. It also has sections on designing a workshop to elicit visuals for an action, the consensus process, and other awesome stuff. As far as activist puppetry goes, I haven’t found any better resource.

"Enacting Participatory Development: Theatre-Based Techniques" by Julie McCarthy This is a completely brilliant book for people working in NGO's, non-profits, grassroots organizations, social justice campaigns... anyone who is interested in using theater techniques for workshops, project planning, evaluation, decision-making, research and more. It was developed through participatory research and training processes and has great exercises that borrow from a range of techniques. It is GREAT.

"Realizing the Impossible: Art Against Authority" edited by Josh MacPhee and Erik Reuland This is an amazing collection of articles that look at many artistic mediums. The part that I have found incredibly valuable is the article titled "When Magic Confronts Authority: The Rise of Protest Puppetry in North America" by Morgan Andrews. It is the only history of recent radical puppetry in the USA that I've found. It looks at puppetry from worker rallies in the 1930's to the anti-globalization movement in this decade and has inspired me and given me many useful ideas.

 

“The Activist Cookbook: Creative Actions for a Fair Economy” by Andrew Boyd

Andrew Boyd is a real genius for creative direct actions--he was one of the inventors of Billionaires for Bush and most of the actions he dreams up are inherently theatrical. I take a lot from the framework he uses when thinking about designing an issue-based street theatre or puppet piece.

 

Participatory Performance Practices (PPP) in Theater for Development: http://www.cdcarts.org/ppp/

I really responded to the principles laid out in this website and have referred to them when about to work in communities that are not my own. Very basically,  PPP combines Participatory Research with Theater in Development to empower communities, facilitate cultural understanding and accountability between communities and theater practitioners, in the process of executing a community-based initiative. The website is a little complicated--I think they were trying to be technologically poetic and imaginative--but it's worth the time it takes to figure it out.

 

The Hemispheric Institute: http://hemi.nyu.edu/

Another incredible online resource, the Hemispheric Institute documents, studies and reports on the intersection between politics and performance in the Americas (North, South and Central). It puts out an online journal and highlights some of the most cutting edge and visionary work that is being done (in my opinion). They also have an Encuentro (a conference) once a year and bring together people from all over the Hemisphere to share their work. Awesome.

 

 

The Center for Civic Participation: Arts and Democracy Project: http://www.ccp.org/organizing/groups/artsdem

This project "builds the momentum of a cultural movement that draws on a rich history of arts activism, social justice organizing, and grassroots engagement. We are engaging the following questions: How do arts and culture play an active role in our democracy? What forms of cultural expression move people to participate in decision-making? What forms of activism and organizing are best linked to arts and cultural work? How can this work become more strategic, effective and sustainable?

The project catalyzes and supports cross-pollination between sectors, cultures, and generations and the linking of practitioners, policymakers, educators, and activists."

npearson's picture

Theatre as a tool for a rehearsal for change

I wanted to highlight a great post that had been made under the "Training for Nonviolent Action" dialogue regarding the benefits of using Theatre as a tool for a rehearsal for change...Augusto Boal

The post includes some useful history regarding the emergence of theater in social change movements as well as great definitions of the various "players" used in the Theatre of the Oppressed model.  I hope people find this cross reference helpful!

Nancy Pearson, New Tactics in Human Rights Program Manager

Selloane's picture

Enabling children through the theatre

 

 

She raised her hand up and asked: ‘what would I have to do to be like abuti Neo[1]?’ The other students laughed at the 15 year old girl. I admired her inquisitiveness, her courage.

Neo had been nominated to represent Basotho children in preparatory consultative processes leading to the 2002 historic United Nations General Assembly Special Session on Children (UNGASSoC)[2].  She subsequently became part of the Junior Committee of the CLRP (Child Law Reform Project))[3]; which was led by the LLRC (Lesotho Law Reform Commission)[4].

 

LLRC set out to create an enabling environment for children’s views to be taken into consideration during the review process. In the case of the CLRP there was a visible blend of stages 5 (consulted and informed) and 6 (adult initiated) of Roger Hart’s Ladder of participation[5] in that although the project was initiated by adults, children’s advise was sought and they were informed about the ultimate benefit of their input. However, during the project, Itumeleng Kimane, CLRP chairperson noted the general negativity of adults; ‘many adults are negative about children’s rights, often due to ignorance[6].’

 

According to the Africa Child Policy Forum, the legislation review process was done by especially creative and unusual means. While this may be true, perhaps the argument would be that the creative benefits of theatre and drama should be mainstreamed in all processes that affect children. The experience of the use of drama and theatre approaches employed in inputting in the reviewed 2004 Child Protection and Welfare Bill justifies my point. To this end, the report compiled  by African Child Policy Forum on  Good Practice for Eastern and southern Africa assertsthe Bill goes further than any other legislation in Africa in providing for children’s duties and responsibilities devolving authority as far as possible to the community level; a suitable and appropriate approach in the African context’.


[1] Pseudonym.

[2] Initially set for 2001, but was postponed due to the 9/11 attacks in the United States of America.

[3] A committee of young people below the age of 18 from different districts of Lesotho who contributed to legislation review process – project had legislation review and capacity building component. It was funded by Save the Children Sweden, Save the Children UK and UNICEF.

[4] Statutory body established in 1993 by Parliament to review all legislation given the context of international and regional protocols that Lesotho commits to. 

[5] http://www.oxfarm.org.au/publications/teaching/doc/participation.pdf - accessed 15 August 2008

[6] http://www.africanchildforum.org/Documents/LesothoReform.pdf - accessed 14 August 2008

 

Motho ke motho ka batho

Annie Sloman's picture

How i got into theatre

I thought I'd just start my contribution to this dialogue by sharing my own story of how I got into theatre, and the impact that it had on my life.

As a teenager I was overweight, unconfident, caught up in community at school that were doing the typical teenage in/out club thing.  Life wasn't the most fun.  One day a woman came to my school from a group called Westside Circus, a community youth circus for young women .  I decided i would take the plunge and join.  It was scary at first, I wasn't strong, I wasn't flexible,  but none of this mattered, it was a safe supportive space were i could myself.   I could work at my own pace and there would be a community that believed in me and would support me.  I remember on the first day it being my turn to get up on a trapeze, I was shaking with fear, and embarrassed that i couldn't lift myself up, but this didn't matter, as a group everybody helped me till i managed to get up, with a huge cheer, what a feeling!   Within 6 months we were performing, and i was one of the main performers, we were sharing our stories, our thoughts, we were showing the power of strong young women of different shapes, sizes and backgrounds. 

It sounds cliché  but 'running away to the circus' really did change my life.  I became proud of my body (how can you not when your holding up 12 people above you in a pyramid),  i found a supportive trusting community (that must be created to truly be able to create theatre or performance for change), a space that was always safe and a way for myself and my community to express ourselves. 

Within a few years i was using theater and circus in my own work for social change.   Understanding from my own experience  the transforming ability that theatre and circus can have on individuals, the community that trains and performs together, and the wider community, whether that being a place where the naughty or fat kid can find there place, a place for people to do positive risk taking, a way for the grass-roots people to tell the big people what they think or  a way for a community to think about ways to build peace in their own community.   Theatre is truly an amazing transforming tool.

 

Xris Reardon's picture

Connections

Annie I was totally captivated to hear you started out with Westside. I know the Circus well, my son was involved in Westside. Currently, the young woman who I provide foster care for is also training with Westside.  She has just finished her second show. She loves it. So much so she is talking about becoming a circus trainer.  I remembering working hard to encourage her to give circus ago, to get her into circus. I felt she would find community there, safety, pride, and a relationship with her body, and it's capacity, beauty beyond the sexualized understanding so often imposed on young women in particular.

I am sharing this story because I want to echo your sentiments about the positive value of physical theatre as another form of theatre. Though I don't work in circus what I saw in my son case and in this young girls case was a transformation that is understandable, yet hard to articulate. They physically felt more confident, capable, open. It has something to do with breaking down imposed understandings,  breaking down self perceptions, limitations, instead learning to fly (sometimes literally).  Also, from what I hear in their accounts and witness in my own work, physical theatre as in other types, a unique space is created where you learn to work with others despite differences, to find a way to mount a show. The show in itself a dare. It takes courage, and courage - risk, is an excellent capacity to foster in our work for change.. Thanks for sharing. I valued your personal account.

kantin's picture

Re: How i got into theatre

Thank you for sharing your story, Annie. It is amazing how powerful theatre can be. It has been really inspiring to read about all the stories of how theatre has been used to provide a safe place to carry out this 'positive risk taking' and move to action - and reading your own person experience confirms this even more.

I look forward to learning more about your work through this dialogue in the next week! 

Kristin Antin, New Tactics Online Community Builder

aabusrour's picture

How I got into theatre?

Hi Annie

Your beautiful story of how theatre is great for social change and find the beauty within us is something that I do share with you completely.

Myself, I was in love with painting, photography and theatre. In theatre mostly as actor and writer. But of course, at that time, when I finished high school, studying arts was not a choice in the sense that it doesn't feed you. So my family said do something to earn your living first and then do whatever you want. I finished a PhD in Biological and Medical Engineering in France, where I stayed 9 years. But in all these years, I didn't stop painting, and joined a theatre class and created with friends a theatre group. At certain moment, I was about to leave my PhD for theatre, and of course, great panic in the family... but I did finish my PhD finally, and I earned my living with it, and earned my spirit and soul with theatre.

I was very shy, and theatre helped me deeply to express more myself, since on stage I wasn't shy at all. I guess this is the greatness of theatre as tool for change and social change, help find the peace within us, and gets out of us the most beautiful and positive energy that we have hiding in us. It is also away that I use with children and youth in Palestine to allow all the stress and violence to dissipate and be expressed on stage rather than in real life... it is away where the beneficiaries find a balance somehow.

I do agree completely with you that it is truly an amazing transforming tool, and a constructive way of making beautiful and non-violent resistance to injustice and oppression..

AbdelFattah Abusrour, PhD Ashoka Fellow Director of Al-Rowwad Cultural and Theatre Training Center ____________________________________________ Alrowwad is an Independent Center for artistic, cultural, and theatre training for

max.vond's picture

my beginning with theatre

Hello,

  I'd like to  hear share a bit about how I came to theatre. When I was ten, my sister volunteered me for a part in a school play.  I had never even considered it, and suddenly there I was.  Acting gave me a big boost of self confidence and I had a great time being an actor through my teenage years.  

  Similarly to AbdelFattah, I didn't study theatre when I went to university.  I somehow felt like it wasn't serious enough, and so I tried to concentrate on a course in Linguistics.  Boy, was that difficult!  It is hard to concentrate on something when it doesn't give you joy.  Something was missing from my life for a long time until I went to teach English in Sudan in 2003.  There, I set up a drama club to use acting as a way for my students to practice their English.  This went very well, and within a few years, I was running the peace-building theatre project I mentioned already.

  I often feel, in the work that I do, that I am an outsider.  Obviously, in Sudan, I didn't know or understand well enough to avoid some of the mistakes which happened.  Nowadays, working with homeless people and migrants in  London, I am also often seen as somebody who isn't native to the  problems faced by the community.  This is frustrating for me, because I am one of those people with a blurry identity - having grown up in five different countries and holding two nationalities, I occasionally wonder where to actually belong.  

   The process of theatre-making, however, solves this problem for me quite frequently.  Going through a sharing time, where participants and facilitator share who they are, a new community is created and somehow, a feeling is created that is like home.  So, maybe that's why I like this work, its like a home-making experience.

   How did others begin?

 

satwood's picture

Theatre and social change

I just read the interview with Janelle Treibitz and it really made a light come on in my head - yes, my head - I tend to intellectualize! I have never been involved in theater, just in social change. But what makes my 12 year old daughter light up is theater and making videos. Her favorite day of the week is Wednesday at the moment because she has drama during the school day AND rehearsal for the fall musical after school. Reading Janelle's interview helped me to understand her passion in a way that I was never able to before. I thought she should spend more time on the soccer field and less in the performing arts area. I was readily able to identify with NT tactics that referred to using the power of youth sports to reach disaffected youth and build a sense of community because that is my comfort zone. But now I am riveted by the accounts of our facilitators  and their experience with street theater and social change. I cannot wait to share this dialogue with my daughter (well the social change angle is not that well developed with her yet......)! But if she wants to continue down this path, I have a strong feeling that, given her upbringing, that will follow.

In my other role, as educator rather than mother - the difference being that I get paid for the latter - the undergraduates in my Leadership for Global Citizenship class are carrying out a country leadership development project. One group is looking at tactics to reach Palestinian youth - I  have shared the posting about Palestinian street theater with them as a potential tactic.

Many thanks to NT and the facilitators for hosting this dialogue and for so vividly highlighting the power of culture to reach across boundaries in a way that intellectualizing alone can rarely do. Now I need to sign off and immediately sign up for my season pass to the Mixed Blood theater in the Twin Cities.

Susan Atwood

roberto_varea's picture

On Witnessing, Beautiful Resistance, and Creative Transformation

Dear All, 

So happy to join in this conversation from the US West Coast, and congratulations to all who put this forum together and participate in it.

 First of all, in introducing myself (I guess you can check my bio & links) I want to also mention that I am also representing  a  team of performance artists and peacebuilders who are busy developing an anthology of meaningful examples of the use of ritual and performance in conflict settings, with a working title of "Performance and Peacebuilding in Global Perspective." Alrowad from Palestine is one of the groups written about, and their concept of "beautiful resistance" resonates deeply with us. On the subject of witnessing, I want to mention the amazing work of the Peruvian theater company "Yuyachkani." This group, who was the recipient of the Peruvian congress medal for human rights in the year 2000, has a series of works where it engages on the notion of the survivor's role in the aftermath of great violence. The ability to "tell the tale" which has informed the work of artists from Argentina to Rwanda is central to their work "Antigona" where one woman play all the traditional roles, rewritten by Peruvian poet Jose Watanabe. At the end of the play, it is revealed that it is Ismene, Antigone's sister, who is "telling the tale." These stories aid the community of survivors in the difficult task of putting the pieces back together after war, occupation or other forms of violence that deeply disrupt the social narratives that bond our communities and give meaning to our lives.

kantin's picture

Re: On Witnessing, Beautiful Resistance, and Creative Transforma

Thanks for joining the conversation, Roberto. I like the idea of using theatre as a 'transformative' tool for communities of survivors. Theatre can be a powerful method strengthen communities after violent atrocities. Has anyone else had experience using theatre in this context?  

Kristin Antin, New Tactics Online Community Builder

missmagan's picture

Theatre as transformation for communities

I've been involved with International Play Ground (IPG) for about 5 years now - IPG is a performing arts group for refugee and immigrant teenagers in St. Louis, which has a large and diverse population of refugees/immigrants from just about everywhere - Afghanistan, Somalia, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Cuba, Haiti, Bosnia, Vietnam, Tanzania, and many more.  We take between 8-16 high school age kids, provide transportation to a once a week rehearsal, and they are paid an hourly wage to create an original theatre piece to be shared with the audience.  We rehearse all year round, culminating with a show in May, and each time I am amazed at what happens for both the young performers and the audience.  This is theatre for social justice at its best:  the performers become agents for change within their own community, sharing their unique perspective as refugee teenagers living in St. Louis , which inevitably changes the perspective of the audience member, while the youth themselves benefit from the healing powers of creating art.  Topics for past shows include their stories of leaving their countries, their stories of arriving here, the domestic abuse so prevalent in their households, bullying, fables written around maxims they felt were important, and also a show about the cycle of oppression - how the oppressor inevitably becomes the oppressed, and back around again.  This year, the youth requested that the group become open to their friends who were American citizens.  I asked what it was that brought that request about, and they simply said that it was time - that this group no longer needed to be just refugees and immigrants.  I found that really interesting....and we did open it up, and it has worked out really nicely.  

skylerdickson's picture

Using theater to fight injustice and restore lives

Greetings!  Thank you all for sharing your experiences and ideas within this dialogue.  It is moving to learn about the ways in which healing and resistance to oppression are enacted.  It seems art exposes the dark reality of our world in ways statistic cannot.  It creates beauty out of catastrophe and challenges us to reflect on our own connection to humanity. 

How great would it be if we could organize a specific day in which theater is used to educate the public and stand against injustice?  If we unified worldwide in these efforts and received some publicity, perhaps we could share these stories with many people.  Is this dream to big?

jtreibitz's picture

World-Wide Unified Theater Events: two examples

I don't think that dream is too big, partly because I've seen it done before and it's been beautiful and effective! There are two examples of world-wide unified theater events to further social justice that I’d like to share. I find them powerful not only because so many people participated, but especially because they are connected to larger organizing efforts that do ongoing work around the issues:

The Vagina Monologues

Millions of people are now familiar with this show which is performed around the world in February near the USA's Valentine's Day. The show is a series of monologues that talk about womens' relationships to their vaginas. It deals with abuse, internalized oppression, body image, rape, liberation, love... Many years ago when I first participated in the play, it completely changed my view of myself and helped me to deal with deep issues I had with my body image and sexuality. 

Eve Ensler, the author and original performer of the monologues, founded V-Day, a movement to end violence against women and girls. Her organization helps raise awareness around violence not only by promoting the performance of the Vagina Monologues, but by encouraging performances to connect to organizations and campaigns world wide that are working to end violence against women. 

V-Day organizes events, benefits, and gatherings to support the movement. They provide opportunities for people to be involved year-round though the V Monologues happen only once a year.  In 9 years they have raised over $50 million and have been active in 120 countries. (Their website is: www.vday.org )

The Lysistrata Project

Two New York actors, Kathryn Blume and Sharon Bower organized this event; world-wide readings and full productions of Aristophanes' Lysistrata as a peace action. In their own words: “A funny, bawdy romp of a play with a strong anti-war message, it seemed an ideal vehicle for theatrical protest. The title character, Lysistrata, organizes women from warring Greek city-states to band together and deny sex to their husbands until they stop the Peloponnesian War. Unable to bear their intense...longings, the men finally agree to lay down their swords and call a permanent truce.

“This all came together in two months.... We wanted to tell the world that [President] Bush doesn't speak for all Americans, and to provide a megaphone for voices of dissent.”

In the midst of a major anti-war movement, activists, organizers and artists came together to use this play as a vehicle for dissent. (Attracting more press coverage than many other anti-war events happening at the time...)

missmagan's picture

human rights theatre festival

I'm looking at the two projects given as examples: Vagina Monologues and Lysistrata Project, one as a part of the women's movement and the latter the anti-war movement.  If we were to do a one-day festival of this sort highlighting human rights issues (of which the women's and anti-war movement could certainly be included)- what would ours look like? what could a common project between the organizations represented on this forum  consist of?  Does anyone know of something like this that already exists on the international level?

gemingzhen's picture

theatre can help cultivate human rights culture

In essence, theatre really can have heavy impact on social culture, so theatre should provide one platform for human rights culture to develop and grow.

Dorothy's picture

Theater is a mirror.

CEPA  

Theater reflects the attitude of man. Theater is really a good tool to curb abuse. The problem with some abusers is that they are unaware of the harm they  do until they see the replica of their behavior  performed in theater. Some are ignorant of the effect of their abusive nature until they see it on the mirror of theater. Oftentimes, they get to have remorse after such experience.

Selloane's picture

Still a bit tricky

I think the dialogue has hit an important factor about change. This is because change comes in different ways, although one would like to believe that theatre would have played a part. You know this recognition is profound to some of us in drama for life, because it means we realize that there cannot be an y quick fix solution. There needs to be time, and honoring the fact that change takes time. I think the post mexico slogan (which we embrace) is profound in terms of 'go deeper go longer'. Perhaps, longer time is one way through which we can give testimonies for change. At the moment, the complexity of change is well recognized, and in many of our initiatives, we try to find creative ways through which we can measure change. From 7 to 9 November, there is going to be an Applied Drama and Theatre conference. Dr. Kennedy Chinyowa will actually be addressing this question from Drama for Life perspective. I will surely post something, even if it after the dialogue, from his insights.

Thank you very much

 

Motho ke motho ka batho

Selloane's picture

Thank you all

This is to extend gratitude for a wonderful learning opportunity. Thank you all. And good luck in your work.

Motho ke motho ka batho

kantin's picture

Keep this dialogue on theatre going....

...Keep this dialogue on theatre going by join the New Tactics online group of theatre practitioners. Start dialogues and share documents with other practitioners using theatre. Go to http://www.newtactics.org/en/community/group/5256 to join!

Kristin Antin, New Tactics Online Community Builder

kantin's picture

Now available: summary of the theatre dialogue!

Hello all, 

Our wonderful intern, Mirja, has created a summary of the theatre dialogue. You can find it here:

http://www.newtactics.org/en/node/5275

Kristin Antin, New Tactics Online Community Builder

Bev Hosking's picture

Training possibility

I am sorry I did not get to take part in this dialogue while it was happening due to work commitments however I have enjoyed reading the contributions and feel very involved in this area of work and have worked in a variety of contexts..

Some of you may be interested in this training opportunity Playback Theatre Summer School in New Zealand in March 2009. We have been working for many years exploring the use of playback theatre as a means to create social dialogue in a community. I am happy to send a hard copy if you find it difficult to read on-line.  

Website    -    http://playbacknet.org/news

warm regards to you all

Bev 

Login or register to subscribe to receive email notifications for this dialogue.